2010
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-010-0101-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RFLP analysis of cpDNA in the genus Hypericum

Abstract: The chloroplast DNA of 43 species including 16 sections from the genus Hypericum was studied by PCR-RFLP analysis. The PCR-amplified products of four cpDNA regions, trnC-trnD, psbC-trnS, trnL-trnF and rbcL were digested with four restriction endonucleases. A high level of interspecific variation was detected while intraspecific diversity was not observed. The resulting parsimony analysis indicated the monophyletic assemblage of the sections Androsaemum, Olympia, Drosocarpium and Trigynobrathys. Monophyly of Hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although only six species representing five sections were included for phylogenetic analysis, relationship among those sections is comparable with previous studies (Crockett et al, 2004;Pilepić et al, 2010). For example, the close relationship between H. ascyron and H. hookerianum was reported by Pilepić et al (2010) and here we recovered the relationship. In addition, there are morphological correlates with the phylogenetic relationships.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although only six species representing five sections were included for phylogenetic analysis, relationship among those sections is comparable with previous studies (Crockett et al, 2004;Pilepić et al, 2010). For example, the close relationship between H. ascyron and H. hookerianum was reported by Pilepić et al (2010) and here we recovered the relationship. In addition, there are morphological correlates with the phylogenetic relationships.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Numbers on each branch represent bootstrap support values (BS). (Pilepić et al, 2010;Meseguer et al, 2013;Nürk et al, 2013). In total, only five DNA markers (psbA-trnH, trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG, rbcL, and internal transcribed spacer) were used in these studies and not generated phylogenetic trees with high resolution, the part reason is due to lacking of variability within these DNA markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory is also supported by the fact that both H. attenuatum and H. maculatum have 16 chromosomes (2 n = 16) while H. perforatum contains 32 chromosomes (2 n = 32) . Alternatively, based on DNA differences with H. attenuatum , it is suggested that H. perforatum may have originated from H. maculatum alone The only way to shed light to the H. perforatum origin is DNA techniques.…”
Section: Dna Barcodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total polyphenol content in our samples was about 50 µg GAE/mg dw and did not differ significantly from the leaves dried in different ways. The measured amount is higher than in other medicinal plants, such as Hypericum perforatum L. [41,42], Gynostemma pentaphyllum L. [43] or Micromeria croatica (Pers.) Schott [44], which were previously measured using similar protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%