2002
DOI: 10.1080/14616740110116155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewriting (Global) Political Economy as Reproductive, Productive, and Virtual (Foucauldian) Economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the intersectional approach is now widely accepted as the basis of feminist organising and analysis in the context of globalisation (see e.g. Marchand and Runyan 2000;Basu et al 2001;Peterson 2002).…”
Section: Fem In Ist Movement Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, the intersectional approach is now widely accepted as the basis of feminist organising and analysis in the context of globalisation (see e.g. Marchand and Runyan 2000;Basu et al 2001;Peterson 2002).…”
Section: Fem In Ist Movement Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, they have shown how male-dominated institutions at the national and international level can derail policies designed to promote gender equality, such as gender mainstreaming, a transnational feminist effort to enhance women's participation in national and international organizations (True 2003; see also the Walby Special Issue on Comparative Gender Mainstreaming 7 (4) (2005)). Through theoretical and empirical studies, IFjP authors have made visible the systemic racial and gender orders entrenched within the productive and virtual economies associated with globalization (Adler 1999;Nordstrom 1999;Peterson 2002). They have demonstrated the seismic proportions of the global reproductive and care economies (Gibson et al 2001;Robinson 2006).…”
Section: Borrowings That Enable New Modes Of Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The definitions of globalization also range between the very narrow ones (preferred by economists) to the much more allencompassing ones that range over the social and cultural as well as the economic. These differences are sometimes over-dichotomized into economic versus cultural, and social science versus humanities approaches (Peterson 2002). Some analysts see globalization primarily as a process while for others it is an outcome.…”
Section: Globalization and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%