2022
DOI: 10.1177/03010066211073855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reward Weakened Inhibition of Return (IOR) in the Near Depth Plane

Abstract: In attentional orienting, researchers have proposed that reward history is a component of attentional control, as the reward value might enhance the spatial attention process to achieve more efficient goal-directed behavior and to improve target-detection performance. Although the effect of reward–induced motivation on attentional orienting has been studied in two–dimensional (2-D) space, the specific mechanisms underlying the influence of reward on inhibition of return (IOR) of attentional orienting in three-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the RTs showed that the motivation induced in the high-reward condition facilitated the processing of sensory information, making the mean RTs in the high-reward group lower than in the low-reward group. This occurrence was consistent with previous findings that reward facilitated the processing of sensory information (Anderson et al, 2011; Failing & Theeuwes, 2014; Pooresmaeili et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2022; Weil et al, 2010). Despite the impressive complexity and processing power of the human brain, its capacity is severely limited (Marois & Ivanoff, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of the RTs showed that the motivation induced in the high-reward condition facilitated the processing of sensory information, making the mean RTs in the high-reward group lower than in the low-reward group. This occurrence was consistent with previous findings that reward facilitated the processing of sensory information (Anderson et al, 2011; Failing & Theeuwes, 2014; Pooresmaeili et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2022; Weil et al, 2010). Despite the impressive complexity and processing power of the human brain, its capacity is severely limited (Marois & Ivanoff, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the one hand, the sample size was based on previous studies of the cross-modal IOR and rewardbased attention (Bucker & Theeuwes, 2014;Handy et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2022); on the other hand, G * Power 3.1.9.7 (Faul et al, 2007(Faul et al, , 2009 was used to estimate the proper sample size (estimated effect size f = 0.25, alpha = 0.05, power = 0.95), suggesting a sample of 23 participants. Thirty-eight participants (16 males and 22 females; age range = 18-26 years, mean age = 20.3 ± 2.5 years) participated.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of Experiment 2 aligned with a recent study that examined spatial attention in 3-D space. It suggested that IOR size in the rewarded conditions was smaller than IOR size in the unrewarded condition and demonstrated that reward can attract much more attention in the near depth (Wang et al, 2022). Similarly, another study also demonstrated that social reward has the power to drive attention orienting behaviors (Hayward et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%