2015
DOI: 10.17507/tpls.0505.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Word Exposure Frequency and Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition

Abstract: Abstract-Incidental vocabulary acquisition (IVA) has long been an important, yet controversial topic in second language acquisition. Word exposure frequency is one of the key factors that influence IVA. Various studies have been conducted to explore exposure frequency in relation to IVA, and have not yet reached an agreement on the effect and the optimal exposure frequency. The exploration of the existing studies reveals the reasons for the conflicting results, which include insufficient reading amount, simpli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study are consistent with previous studies which stated that performance is better for high frequency words than low frequency ones because the representations of high frequency words in long-term memory are either more accessible or more specified than those of low frequency words (Mandler, 1980;Scarborough, Cortese & Scarborough, 1977). The observation made on participants' lexical access also proved that the high frequency words are accessed faster than their low frequency counterparts (Forster & Chambers, 1973;Howes & Solomon, 1951;Zhu, 2015). The more frequently a lexical item is used, the more quickly it is recognized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The findings of this study are consistent with previous studies which stated that performance is better for high frequency words than low frequency ones because the representations of high frequency words in long-term memory are either more accessible or more specified than those of low frequency words (Mandler, 1980;Scarborough, Cortese & Scarborough, 1977). The observation made on participants' lexical access also proved that the high frequency words are accessed faster than their low frequency counterparts (Forster & Chambers, 1973;Howes & Solomon, 1951;Zhu, 2015). The more frequently a lexical item is used, the more quickly it is recognized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%