2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07621-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve of PM2.5 concentration: evidence from prefecture-level and above cities of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2019b ; Shen et al. 2020 ; Wang and Komonpipat 2020 ). The lack of comprehensive research on environmental inequality in China, including theories and national empirical studies of SES and ambient air pollution, are important gaps in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019b ; Shen et al. 2020 ; Wang and Komonpipat 2020 ). The lack of comprehensive research on environmental inequality in China, including theories and national empirical studies of SES and ambient air pollution, are important gaps in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding was supported by a prior paper reported that the risk of PM 2.5 exposure was declining in most western developed countries; in contrast, the risk of PM 2.5 exposure was prominent in developing countries ( 44 ). Since 2013, the Chinese government has carried out a pilot project to monitor PM 2.5 concentration in 33 major cities and implemented an air quality standard for PM 2.5 concentration in 2016 ( 45 ). In 2019, the PM 2.5 concentration in 22 of 31 major cities in mainland China exceeded the annual limitation concentration for China (35.0 μg/m 3 ) and 31 of them exceeded the WHO recommendation (10.0 μg/m 3 ) ( 46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the impact that environmental pollution has on economic growth, Krueger (1991, 1995) proposed multiple innovations; however, there are divergent and varying perspectives on whether the Kuznets effect is an inverted U-or N-type (Stern & Zha, 2016;Egbetokun et al, 2020;Hao et al, 2018;Wang & Komonpipat, 2020). This disagreement may be due to inconsistent data (with respect to inconsistent years) used by previous studies, as well as statistical bias and a lack of regional heterogeneity inclusion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to previous studies (Yan et al, 2020;Ouyang et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2019;Wang & Komonpipat, 2020), this study also compensated for a set of urban fixed effects variables in the benchmark regression model to minimize bias caused by the omitted variables. Specifically, the population density variable was measured by the number of people per unit area; the infrastructure variable was measured by the number of paved roads per capita, the number of operating buses at the end of the year, and the number of hospitals; the local STI (science, technology, and innovation) development variable was measured by the number of patent applications; and the urbanization variable was measured by the proportion of the urban population.…”
Section: Model Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%