2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the dimensionality of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an international sample of patients with ischaemic heart disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous results in literature [48,49] confirm the high correlation found between HADS-A and HADS-D (r = .777, p b 0.001). In order to avoid collinearity between the covariates at the ANCOVA, we performed an exploratory factor analysis of HADS.…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Previous results in literature [48,49] confirm the high correlation found between HADS-A and HADS-D (r = .777, p b 0.001). In order to avoid collinearity between the covariates at the ANCOVA, we performed an exploratory factor analysis of HADS.…”
Section: Statistical Analysessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These data provide psychometric evidence against the internal consistency of the two subscales in favor of the reliability of the HADS-Tot [9,10]. What is more, a recent study shows that the HADS-Tot is a valid measure and that it is predictive of future symptoms of distress, healthcare costs and quality of life in a CHD population [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A recent systematic review analysed the diagnostic accuracy of different screening tools, including the "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" (HADS), in detecting MDD in CHD patients [4]. Although it highlighted that the HADS is a useful self-report instrument in CVD patients [4], other studies call into question the diagnostic accuracy of the two subscales separately, but strongly suggest the use of the HADS total score (HADS-Tot) [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations