Revisiting Jewson and Mason: The Politics of Gender Equality in UK Local Government in a Cold Climate

Abstract

This paper revisits Jewson and Mason's seminal theoretical framework on liberal and radical approaches to equal opportunity policy and practice by applying it to our research on the implementation of the Gender Equality Duty in UK local government. Conducted at the height of Thatcherism, Jewson and Mason's research offers a useful platform for assessing equality initiatives in local government during periods of political hostility to equality underpinned by cuts to public services, which in more recent time is ascribed to austerity. Drawing on qualitative research in five case study local authorities, this paper assesses strategies for protecting and promoting gender equality practices and policies in the face of change within public services. We analyse three types of politics of equality (political philosophy, organizational politics and party politics) that feature in Jewson and Mason's analysis. In line with recent feminist research, our data indicate that equality specialists continue to use both liberal and radical discourses in instrumental ways to promote equality and resist change as described by Jewson and Mason, but these were more clearly framed within business case arguments influenced by the modernization agenda of the 1990s. Our data indicate that even business case arguments have been unable to protect equality initiatives from the 2010 coalition government's austerity and cuts agenda.

The revival and refashioning of gender pay equity in New Zealand

“…In practice, however, organisations and the institutions that regulate them have seldom ventured into the terrain opened up by transformative equality strategies (Cockburn, 1989; Conley and Page, 2017; Parker, 2003; Smith et al., 2017). As much feminist scholarship signals, recent environments have been characterised by pressures on regulation that facilitate market reforms.…”

Flat Out! Dancing the city at a time of austerity

“…The particular conditions of reservation and insertion of the formerly colonised population, who were 'consolidated [as a] relative surplus population' within a 'racialised hierarchy' of employment in the UK (Harris, 1993: 50) have led to a 2014 unemployment rate for Birmingham's black population that is approximately three times that of the white population in the city (BRAP, 2015), within an overall city rate of unemployment that, in the 2016 figures (Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce, 2017: 11), stood at 9.0%, compared to a 4.9% UK average. In short, Birmingham is a post-industrial, postcolonial city (Henry et al, 2002), without a full quota of service jobs to replace the dwindling manufacturing ones (see Barber and Hall, 2008), and with high black and female employment in a public sector that is shrinking continually under austerity measures (Conley and Page, 2017). Amid these entanglements it is easy to see the attraction and sorting that Hall and Savage (2016) note within the urban vortex, but I also see the proud angle of my parents' heads when telling their children about their level of training, and the skilled familiarity of my parents' fingers when they touched fabric or wood.…”

From evidence to action: Applying gender mainstreaming to pay gaps in the Welsh public sector

“…However, Jones et al (forthcoming) also conclude that the improvement in women's human capital has reached the limit of its capacity in enhancing women's pay as, despite higher qualifications, gender pay gaps cannot be further diminished while women remain clustered in lower paying occupations. They also identify a narrowing pay gap for public organizations, relative to private, although this ceases from 2010 onwards, raising queries over whether this represents a ‘historical shift’ or a transient phase linked to austerity (Conley, ; Conley & Page, ; Jones et al, forthcoming, p. 19).…”