2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19222-2_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Image Vignetting Correction by Constrained Minimization of Log-Intensity Entropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NUIC is typically applied to remote sensing images [10], optical microscope images [11], aerial images [12], and scanned images [13]. Also, there is a need to remove vignetting in optical photography [14,15]. According to the image enhancement model, the traditional NUIC algorithms are mainly included three categories: incident-reflection multiplicative model, mathematical-statistical model, and light additive model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NUIC is typically applied to remote sensing images [10], optical microscope images [11], aerial images [12], and scanned images [13]. Also, there is a need to remove vignetting in optical photography [14,15]. According to the image enhancement model, the traditional NUIC algorithms are mainly included three categories: incident-reflection multiplicative model, mathematical-statistical model, and light additive model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various calibration methods have been proposed in the vignetting literature, such methods require that users follow complicated observation procedures in controlled environments, e.g., taking reference images with known camera configurations to estimate vignetting functions [2], [5]. Goldman [1] showed that vignetting functions can be estimated without special calibration objects or controlled lighting conditions; however, his method still requires multiple images with the same vignetting pattern.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amaral's algorithm employs background subtraction for illumination compensation, and subsequent histogram based thresholding with morphological filtering [9]. Compensation of Uneven illumination (vignetting) is suggested based on filtering and illumination modeling, but without segmentation based assessment in literature [16][17][18]. Our algorithm is different from others in the sense that it is segmentation centric, and usually, there is only one parameter in the threshold is to be adjusted iteratively with range [0,1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%