Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting consciousness: Distinguishing between states of conscious focused attention and mind wandering with EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the heaviest memory load with digit target form, node degrees of Cz and F8 are most obviously enhanced when memorization compared with the control stage, and node degrees of FP1 and F7 are most obviously weakened. Considering that Cz has been widely applied to attention feedback/training to track attention level in real time [ 42 ], it is reasonable that Cz functions more actively in memory than in control, resulting in node degree of Cz increasing. In addition, according to Okamoto and colleague's work on correlation between the international 10–20 system and Brodmann Area (BA) [ 43 ]; FP1, F7, and F8 correspond to BA9 and BA10, which are believed responsible for working memory, attention, and task management and planning [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the heaviest memory load with digit target form, node degrees of Cz and F8 are most obviously enhanced when memorization compared with the control stage, and node degrees of FP1 and F7 are most obviously weakened. Considering that Cz has been widely applied to attention feedback/training to track attention level in real time [ 42 ], it is reasonable that Cz functions more actively in memory than in control, resulting in node degree of Cz increasing. In addition, according to Okamoto and colleague's work on correlation between the international 10–20 system and Brodmann Area (BA) [ 43 ]; FP1, F7, and F8 correspond to BA9 and BA10, which are believed responsible for working memory, attention, and task management and planning [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous EEG studies aimed, inter alia, at establishing links between MW and the theta/beta ratio 33 , or generally a given frequency peak 34 , and identifying EEG signature of off-task though using thought-probe method and ERP analysis 35,36 . The frequency-focused investigations have produced quite divergent results suggesting that MW is associated with alpha 36,37 delta and gamma 38 or by delta, theta and alpha bands 39 . In this aspect, functional connections which differentiated our groups have occurred mainly in the theta, delta and gamma bands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there is substantial evidence for the key role alpha oscillations play in gating information flow throughout the brain (Jensen & Mazaheri, 2010;Klimesch, 2012), and as a top-down inhibitory control mechanism to maintain task performance by suppressing task-irrelevant information (Händel et al, 2011). Numerous studies have reported greater alpha power over frontal, central, parietal and occipital scalp areas during periods of TUT (Arnau et al, 2020;Baldwin et al, 2017;Ceh et al, 2020;Compton et al, 2019;Dias da Silva et al, 2022;Groot et al, 2021;Hanslmayr et al, 2011;Jin et al, 2019;Macdonald et al, 2011;Martel et al, 2019), positioning it as a promising EEG signature of mind-wandering despite some evidence to the opposite (Baird et al, 2014;Braboszcz & Delorme, 2011). Together with the attenuation in ERP amplitudes, greater alpha-band activity suggests a drop in the cortical processing of the external environment as attention is redirected internally during TUT.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Markers Of Mind Wanderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kam et al, 2010; Martel et al, 2019). The amplitude of the P3, which indexes the general level of cognitive processing or allocation of attentional resources (Polich, 2007), has also been observed to be reduced during TUTs in various studies (Baldwin et al, 2017; Dias da Silva et al, 2022; Gouraud et al, 2021; Groot et al, 2021; Kam et al, 2010; Smallwood et al, 2008). In line with the perceptual decoupling hypothesis of mind-wandering (Smallwood & Schooler, 2015), these findings suggest a strong link with a general attenuation in cortical processing of external stimuli causing a drop in short-term performance (Mooneyham & Schooler, 2013; Randall et al, 2014) and overall vigilance (Braboszcz & Delorme, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation