2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2016-0519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting burst pressure models for corroded pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is because they are important in predicting the failure pressure in corroded pipelines with greater accuracy and reliability. Therefore, FEA is recommended in cases where the corrosion defect shows complex geometry and when the risk of a pipeline failure is very high (Phan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because they are important in predicting the failure pressure in corroded pipelines with greater accuracy and reliability. Therefore, FEA is recommended in cases where the corrosion defect shows complex geometry and when the risk of a pipeline failure is very high (Phan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, they implemented a differential evolution algorithm to minimize the prediction errors. The expressions achieved are the following [75]:…”
Section: Approaches Proposed By Phan Et Al [75]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patterns can be explained considering the defect idealization and the fact that some models like Phan1-3 were obtained based on methods that minimized the error predictions from a set of experimental tests. Actually, Phan and co-workers have pointed out possible conservative results with their burst models [75].…”
Section: Mean Time To Failure Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research projects have been published, with a view to developing a semi-data driven and semianalytical model; the aim is for the final result to be a solid equation for predicting the variable of interest with optimized factors. [31][32][33] These models have the obvious advantages of being explicit and requiring least computational effort. Phan et al 31 use pre-fixed equations with changeable factors, and optimize them by minimizing the error between simulated and predicted outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] These models have the obvious advantages of being explicit and requiring least computational effort. Phan et al 31 use pre-fixed equations with changeable factors, and optimize them by minimizing the error between simulated and predicted outputs. The authors later developed their study with Phan et al, 32 developing an empirical model to predict defective pipe moment capacity, with 49 factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%