Revisioning models of instructional development

Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design

“…The design process can be characterized by several stages: problem analysis, design and development, implementation and evaluation (Gustafson & Branch, 1997). All articles reported about the design and development activities of the TDT, which were often preceded by activities related to problem analysis.…”

Identifying complex cultural interactions in the instructional design process: a case study of a cross-border, cross-sector training for innovation program

“…Gustafson and Branch (1997) would answer yes. In a review of the history and emerging trends of instructional development models, these authors defend the fundamentals of ADDIE and its progeny of models as broadly applicable and accurate against claims that it is not well-suited to current pedagogies or conditions of dynamic, constructivist and cross-cultural environments.…”

“…In a review of the history of instructional systems development models, Gustafson and Branch (1997) describe ISD as a systemic process; Branch and Deissler (2008) describe systemic processes as those where the whole system responds to individual stimuli because of non-linear relationships between components. Banathy (1987) describes the systems approach as addressing large-scale highly complex problems; the globalization of instructional technology and proliferation of cross-sector, cross-border training environments can be viewed as a large-scale, highly complex problem.…”

“…After gaining IRB approval in March 2009, I conducted a pilot study for this research informed by a broad theoretical framework of IDT and ISD process modeling in a global context (Branch & Deissler, 2008;Damarin, 1998;Gustafson & Branch, 1997;Heemskerk, Brink, Volman & ten Dam, 2005;Henderson, 1996;Seufert, 2001;VisscherVoerman & Gustafson, 2004;Willis, 2005). The purpose of the research at the time of the pilot study was to describe the process and highlight the distinct features and challenges of instructional design in a US government agency/public university program to train applied research and development teams brought to the United States by an Indian company.…”

Content analysis of research trends in instructional design models: 1999-2014

“…Gustafson and Branch (2002) outlined three instructional design model types: product, class, and system. Combining these approaches, instructional design can be defined as a systematic method that (a) covers such stages of the teaching process as analysis, design, development, evaluation, and management; (b) is based on instructional and learning theories; and (c) enhances the quality of teaching (Dick, Carey, & Carey, 2001;Dooley, 2005;Gustafson & Branch, 1997;Morrison, Ross, & Kemp, 2004;Posner & Rudnitsky, 2001;Smith & Ragan, 1993. Hakkinen (2002) denoted that traditional instructional design models are rooted in behaviorism and that the field of instructional design has been developing since the first models appeared.…”