Reviewing the Interaction Aspects of a Line of Electronic Brainstorming Social Interfaces

Zelchenko, Peter; Ivanov, Alex; Mileva, Emma

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00560-3_45

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main reason cited for this was the elimination of production blocking [9]. In EBS, participants write down their ideas in a chat or discussion forum [20]. In this way, participants can express ideas at the same time and are no longer blocked in their flow of thoughts by others speaking.…”

Section: Brainstorming and Negative Group Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Virtual Reality Affordances and Constraints on Negative Group Effects during Brainstorming Sessions

Fromm¹,

Mirbabaie²,

Stieglitz³

2020

WI2020 Zentrale Tracks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Idea generation processes are important for companies to develop new products and services, and brainstorming is a popular method for generating ideas in groups. However, it has been shown that negative group effects can occur during brainstorming sessions, especially since teams today often collaborate from different locations. Therefore, electronic brainstorming systems are needed that foster creativity while reducing negative group effects. We extend the research on electronic brainstorming systems by investigating how virtual reality affordances and constraints influence the occurrence of negative group effects in virtual reality brainstorming sessions. We conduct a qualitative study with 18 participants consisting of virtual reality brainstorming sessions and subsequent interviews. Using the affordance network approach, we explain the occurrence of production blocking and evaluation apprehension. Furthermore, we suggest extending this approach by incorporating constraintoutcome units and discuss whether the notion of affordance actualization can be transferred to constraints.

show abstract

Section: Brainstorming and Negative Group Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%