2017
DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2017.1300839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing capital cost estimations in aquaculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ScienceDirect, ‘bioeconomic AND modeling AND tilapia, and in Springer Link, “bioeconomic AND modeling AND tilapia”’. The selection criteria were those of Llorente and Luna 6 and Ruiz‐Campo and Zuniga‐Jara, 28 which consists of the selection of the works in which a mathematical model is developed or used that considers the biological, environmental and economic elements. In addition, the literature review works by Pomeroy et al 4 and Llorente and Luna 6 and other search engines, such as Google Scholar, were consulted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ScienceDirect, ‘bioeconomic AND modeling AND tilapia, and in Springer Link, “bioeconomic AND modeling AND tilapia”’. The selection criteria were those of Llorente and Luna 6 and Ruiz‐Campo and Zuniga‐Jara, 28 which consists of the selection of the works in which a mathematical model is developed or used that considers the biological, environmental and economic elements. In addition, the literature review works by Pomeroy et al 4 and Llorente and Luna 6 and other search engines, such as Google Scholar, were consulted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only peer‐reviewed works were considered. Each search engine with its own algorithm looks for the selected words within the title, abstract and keywords of the article or searching the entire text 28 . Another search engine was the Web of Science (WoS), searching for the categories of Agricultural Engineering and Fisheries since aquaculture category is lacking in WoS 28 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual discount rate was set to 0.03, which is the interest rate offered by government‐supported financing systems for fisheries and aquaculture in the area. Campo and Zuniga‐Jara (2018) reported a discount rate of 8.07% annually for shellfish culture in developed countries. The farmers in the study area rarely raise funds from banks or the capital market.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter problems are obviously minimized by aquaculture techniques, to which however is added the additional cost of feeding fish. Currently, although the cost of farmed fish is much lower than that of wild fish, it has been calculated that more than 50% of the total cost of farmed fish is influenced by feed ingredients [29]. In this scenario, the use of food waste for fish farming would be a sustainable strategy not only to avoid the cost of organic waste disposal, but also a way to decrease the cost of feeding fish in aquaculture, and thus the final price to the consumer.…”
Section: Use Of Agri-food Waste In Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%