1996
DOI: 10.1177/030802269605900214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing a Research Article

Abstract: This article provides guidelines for readers interested in learning to review research papers formally. The general principles of the review process are covered, as well as possible issues and questions surrounding the content of the sections. The article forms part of a symposium entitled ‘An Introduction to Writing for Publication in Professional Journals’, prepared by the Editorial Board of BJOT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, all six studies observed significant associations, and while no study is perfect [50], it is important to identify the positive contributions made to the evidence base by the reviewed research [51]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, all six studies observed significant associations, and while no study is perfect [50], it is important to identify the positive contributions made to the evidence base by the reviewed research [51]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These confounding variables could provide an alternative explanation for the effect on quality of life in women with breast cancer, thus the internal validity of the studies could be queried. 60,67,68 Another possible limitation of all the studies was the Hawthorne effect, whereby subjects may have responded differently because of their awareness of being observed. 42,52,54 …”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New titles, for example, were added to the Symposium on Writing for Publication (1998). They contained practical advice on writing an abstract (Ballinger et al 1996), presenting research papers (Walker 1997), reviewing and evaluating research articles (Drummond 1996, Finlay 1997) and using descriptive statistics (Gissane 1998). Support and advice were also offered at the many study days and workshops on writing for publication held throughout the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Jenny King 1996-1998mentioning
confidence: 99%