1970
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/20110901-295-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review. Use of psychrometers in field measurements of plant material: accuracy and handling difficulties

Abstract: For years, one of the major concerns of agronomists has been the study of how variations in the crop environment can affect proper crop development. A variety of factors must be considered, including factors such as plant genetics, climatic conditions or soil, and factors directly dependent on man such as technology or labour. In the search for sustainable development, all these factors must coexist in perfect harmony in order AbstractThe determination of leaf water potential is useful in the establishment of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although difficult to use in the field, mainly because of daily changes in air temperature, some TCP instruments can be used under field conditions [50,51]. Recently, a new type of small tensiometer has been developed for the measurement of water potential in plants.…”
Section: Leaf and Stem Water Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although difficult to use in the field, mainly because of daily changes in air temperature, some TCP instruments can be used under field conditions [50,51]. Recently, a new type of small tensiometer has been developed for the measurement of water potential in plants.…”
Section: Leaf and Stem Water Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the plant level, leaf-water stress indices have been quantified according to the plant's water potential at different times of the day, such as predawn or midday, or in different plant parts, such as the leaf or stem. Leaf-water potential is easily determined using a Scholander pressure chamber (Scholander et al, 1965) or, more recently, with a water activity meter (Martínez et al, 2011a(Martínez et al, , 2012a(Martínez et al, and 2013b. The integration of long-term leaf-water potential values into a single value was introduced by Myers (1988).…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting irrigation is applied based on previous experience and weather conditions for that year. Irrigation is performed to support nutrient absorp- (Gee et al, 1992;Martínez et al, 2011a) according to the methodology proposed by Martínez et al (2013b). The technique for measuring leaf-water potential with a water activity meter implies the measurement of leaf disks with three repetitions (n=3) per plant, performed in sequential measurements by the measuring equipment, having previously sanded the leaves to eliminate the cuticle.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Fertigation Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring of water conditions in plants is important for determining the optimal timing of irrigation, thus avoiding losses arising from lack of water. To this end, indicators of plant water status through measurement of water potential of their organs (mainly leaves) have been frequently used by means of either a method based on equilibrium vapor pressure (psychometric/thermocouple techniques) (Martinez et al, 2011) or on pressure balance (pressure chamber) (Boyer, 1967); linear transducers to determine inference from variation in leaf thickness (Seelig et al 2012) and/or microdendrometry technique to assess variation in trunk/stem diameter (Simmoneau et al, 1993;Junjittakarn et al, 2011) are also used. Despite all these alternatives for evaluating plant water status, studies in this research field present problems involving the representativeness of these stress indicators based on the plant itself , especially those that use inferences from physiological responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%