2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Virtual Reality Technology: An Ergonomic Approach and Current Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“….., X N −1 (the list of the coefficients of a finite combination of complex sinusoids, ordered by their frequencies). The DFT function is shown in equation (6). Figure 4 shows the PSD results for the user.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….., X N −1 (the list of the coefficients of a finite combination of complex sinusoids, ordered by their frequencies). The DFT function is shown in equation (6). Figure 4 shows the PSD results for the user.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enabling VR to reach its potential, will largely depend on our ability to solve the substantial and enduring problem of motion sickness, which can lead to nausea, dizziness, disorientation, fatigue, and instability. The major cause of motion sickness is undesirable outcomes of hardware and software insufficiency, including low resolution and refresh rates of the image, non-ergonomic interactions, and inappropriate navigation modes [6]- [8]. A common tool for measuring motion sickness in VR is the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a predominant concern for the implementation of VR in cognitive sciences is the presence of VRISE (Bohil et al, 2011;de França and Soares, 2017;Palmisano et al, 2017), which may compromise health and safety standards (Parsons et al, 2018), as well as the reliability of cognitive (Nalivaiko et al, 2015), physiological (Nalivaiko et al, 2015), and neuroimaging data (Arafat et al, 2018;Gavgani et al, 2018). Equally, the high cost of VR software development may additionally deter the adoption of VR as a research tool in cognitive sciences (Slater, 2018).…”
Section: Vr Software Development In Cognitive Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR has great potential as an effective telemedicine tool that may resolve the current methodological problem of ecological validity (Rizzo et al, 2004;Bohil et al, 2011;Parsons, 2015;Parsons et al, 2018). However, the appropriateness of VR, especially for head-mounted display (HMD) systems, is still controversial (Bohil et al, 2011;de França and Soares, 2017;Palmisano et al, 2017). The principal concern is the adverse symptomatology (i.e., nausea, dizziness, disorientation, fatigue, and instability) which stems from the implementation of VR systems (Bohil et al, 2011;de França and Soares, 2017;Palmisano et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation