Review of urban-rural integration evaluation: Connotation identification, theoretical analysis, and system reconstruction

Zhou, De; Qi, J. C.; Zhong, Wen-yu

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20211013

Cited by 14 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The focus is on the human, geographical, economic, social, and ecological characteristics of town and country regions [6,7]. With respect to the theoretical aspects, in the West, the issues of urban-rural relations and how to coordinate URD have historically been a concern, mostly with the concepts of "urban-rural linkage" and "URD", but rarely references "URI", and the relevant studies are more diffuse, diversified and complex, but all fall within the realm of urbanrural relations [8]. Ideal socialism is an ideology dating back to the 16th century, which introduced the concept of URD and served as a source of inspiration for later research on urban-rural connections [9].…”

Section: Study Of the Uri's Connotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the Level of Urban–Rural Integration Development and Analyzing the Spatial Pattern Based on the New Development Concept: Evidence from Cities in the Yellow River Basin

Wei

Zhao

Jian-xin

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban‒rural integration development (URID) is the solution to the excessive urban‒rural gap, unequal and insufficient development in urban‒rural areas, along with the process of dynamic and balanced urban‒rural growth. The promotion of high-quality development and sustainable development in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) depends heavily on the scientific development of an evaluation index for urban‒rural integration (URI), the quantitative measurement of the level of URI, and the accurate identification of the spatial layout of URI. The URI indicator system is built using the new development philosophy, and 94 cities in the YRB are used as samples. The spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the URID in the YRB were studied from 2010 to 2020 using the entropy value method and coupled coordination model. The study shows that from 2010 to 2020, along the YRB, both urban and rural development (URD) levels generally increased. However, regional differences increased and development levels varied, showing a trend of uneven development between provinces. Overall, the degree of URID was increasing and still low, but there are three main types of urban‒rural coupling and coordination (URCC) that are relatively stable: barely coordinated, primary coordination, and on the verge of disorder. Primary coordination replaced barely coordinated as the dominant type over time. Finally, it is suggested that urban and rural regions should not be “managed separately” but rather should be viewed as a cohesive organic whole; to drive urban cluster construction and spur rural development, to further close the urban‒rural divide, reliance on the city centre is necessary. Concurrently, this encourages the transfer of farm labour and supports the coordinated growth of urban‒rural industries; investment in advantageous industries is strengthened; the construction of URIs should be promoted at a more microscopic city and county level; and strong support is provided to achieve high-quality sustainable development of the YRB. It is important to put into practice the new development philosophy, investigate the fundamental causes of the growing urban‒rural divide, change the development strategy, and optimize this new development path.

show abstract

Section: Study Of the Uri's Connotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the Level of Urban–Rural Integration Development and Analyzing the Spatial Pattern Based on the New Development Concept: Evidence from Cities in the Yellow River Basin

Wei

Zhao

Jian-xin

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Under the influence of China's socialist economic development and policy, China has opened up a unique road of urban-rural integration. The relationship between urban and rural areas in China was further emphasized from the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [13]. This reflects the continuous succession of China's urban and rural development strategies and the deepening of the understanding of urban-rural relations.…”

Section: Urban-rural Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urban–Rural Integration Empowers High-Quality Development of Tourism Economy: Mechanism and Empirical Evidence

Wang,

Gao,

Zhu

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban–rural integration has become an effective way to promote the high-quality development of the tourism economy in China’s policy evolution. Based on provincial panel data for China for the last ten years, this paper measured the high-quality-development level of the tourism economy based on multi-dimensional indicators, including by empirically analyzing the influence mechanisms in urban–rural integration. We found that urban–rural integration has a positive empowering effect on the high-quality development of the tourism economy as a whole, with the integration of urban and rural areas in the central and eastern regions playing a considerable role; however, its role in the western region is not obvious. This was shown through an analysis of the mediating effect by which urban–rural integration empowers the high-quality development of the tourism economy by improving residents’ income levels. However, urban–rural integration does not empower the high-quality development of the tourism economy through technological innovation, which instead has a covering effect. This paper makes suggestions on three levels: country, region, and enterprise. Firstly, at the national level, we suggest strengthening the overall planning for the high-quality development of the tourism economy, as well as improving its construction system. Secondly, at the regional level, governments at all levels should emphasize the functional differences between urban and rural areas and regional characteristics. Finally, at the enterprise level, enterprises in the western region should seize the opportunities provided by urban–rural integration.

show abstract

“…1.1 县域城乡融合发展的内涵认知城乡融合是指促进城乡之间各要素相互融合，逐步缩小城乡差距，实现动态均衡发展的过程 [24] 。县域从概念上可以定义为以县级行政区划为边界，以县城为中心、乡村为腹地的地域空间，拥有较完备的产业体系和社会功能，是国民经济的基础单元，也是国家治理的重要基础 [25] 。不同于城市建成区面积占比较高的大中城市，县域的绝大多数空间由乡镇和村庄所占据，位于"城尾乡头"的县城则是连接大中城市、服务乡村的关键载体，这就决定了中国在城乡融合阶段，融合的载体、融合的抓手和融合的基点在县域 [26] 5) 生态上，县域是城乡生态保护修护与生态产品价值实现的主战场 [27] 。乡村地区是县域生态空间的重要载体，而县城生态环境则相对脆弱。县域城乡融合要注重生态保护修复的系统性与整体性，改善城乡人居空间生态环境，发挥县城在生态产业链延伸升级与生态产品消费中的引领作用，带动乡村生态绿色资源价值转化，促进生态资源共享共护共建。因此，县域城乡融合发展可以理解为新时代背景下，以县域为基本单元，以县城为辐射中心，协同推进新型城镇化和乡村振兴，发挥县城"以城带乡"的关键"接点"作用，推动城乡发展在经济社会上的差距逐渐缩小，在政治、文化、生态文明上相互融合的过程，其实现途径的关键在于城乡要素交换流动的自由顺畅。 1.2 县域城乡融合发展面临的问题与基本驱动力从中国城乡关系发展的历程来看，建国初期为尽快实现社会主义工业化，国家采取了严格限制城乡要素流动的措施，农村在城乡关系中长期扮演着要素供给者的角色 [11] 。新时代城乡融合发展的关键是实现城乡生产要素自由流动与平等交换，借助市场力量实现生产要素的合理配置，打破城乡要素单向流动的壁垒。中共中央、国务院于 2020 年印发的《关于构建更加完善的要素市场化配置体制机制的意见》明确指出要破除阻碍要素自由流动的体制机制障碍，实现要素价格市场决定、流动自主有序、配置高效公平。当前土地、人口、资金三大要素流动不畅是城乡融合发展亟需破解的核心难题，在县域上主要表现为： (1) 土地层面上，农村集体土地与国有土地权力不平等，集体建设用地产权不明晰、权能不完整、实现方式单一等问题得不到有效解决，制约了农村集体建设用地市场的形成，损害了农民的权益。 (2) 资本层面上，工商资本下乡与农村本地资本形成仍然存在许多困难。工商资本下乡面临"用地难" "融资难" "人才短缺"等三大障碍，而农村集体经济组织资本来源缺乏、组织发展能力较弱则限制了农村本地化资本的形成。(3) 人口层面上，县域经济增长乏力、人才保障机制不健全，导致人才难引难留，农村年轻劳动力离乡离土，农村农业发展缺乏人才。破解县域城乡融合发展面临的核心难题，最根本的就是要破除城乡土地、人口、资本三大要素流动的障碍。其中，土地资源是城乡发展中最核心的基础资源，是人口与资本的空间载体，对要素配置起系统引领作用 [28] 。市场经济行为实现生产要素合理配置的前提是产权明晰化 [29] ，明晰农村土地要素的产权结构是促进城乡土地要素自由平等流…”

Section: 县域城乡融合发展的内涵认知与基本驱动力unclassified

County urban-rural integration and homestead system reform:Theoretical logic and implementation path

LU,

TONG,

LONG

et al. 2023

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

。2017 年党的"十九大"报告首次明确提出"城乡融合"的概念，强调"三农" 问题是关系国计民生的根本性问题，标志着中国城乡关系进入融合发展的新阶段。县域是既有城市又有乡村的基本行政单元，是实现城乡融合发展的基本场域 [2] 。2022 年 5 月，中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发的《关于推进以县城为重要载体的城镇化建设的意见》(简称《意见》) 明确指出，县城是中国城镇体系的重要组成部分，是城乡融合发展的关键支撑。因此，以县域为基本单元推进城乡融合发展，促进城乡人口、土地、资金等生产要素自由流动，是解决新时期中国社会主要矛盾的重要抓手。在中国，土地二元制是造成城乡失衡最主要的制度 [3] 。宅基地作为农村土地的重要组成部分，具有高度的身份性和福利保障性。但随着城市化的深入，城乡人口流动加速，其居住保障功能日益弱化，农村地区出现较为严重的"人户分离"现象，宅基地闲置荒废、低效利用等问题普遍存在 [4] 。据中国社会科学院测算，2018 年，全国农村宅基地总面积约为 1.7 亿亩 (1 亩≈ 667 m 2 ) ，约有 1800 多万亩处于连续两年居住月数不足一个月的高度闲置或荒废状态，空置率超过 10%，样本村庄宅基地空置率最高达 71.5% [5] 。在保障农民居住安全的前提收稿日期：2022-12-05；修订日期：2023-02-25 基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目 (41971205) 作者简介：陆进锋 (1999-) ，男，广东清远人，硕士，研究方向为城乡发展与土地利用。

show abstract

Review of urban-rural integration evaluation: Connotation identification, theoretical analysis, and system reconstruction

Cited by 14 publications

References 49 publications

Measuring the Level of Urban–Rural Integration Development and Analyzing the Spatial Pattern Based on the New Development Concept: Evidence from Cities in the Yellow River Basin

Measuring the Level of Urban–Rural Integration Development and Analyzing the Spatial Pattern Based on the New Development Concept: Evidence from Cities in the Yellow River Basin

Urban–Rural Integration Empowers High-Quality Development of Tourism Economy: Mechanism and Empirical Evidence

County urban-rural integration and homestead system reform:Theoretical logic and implementation path

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About