2004
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the Validity and Significance of Cannabis Withdrawal Syndrome

Abstract: The authors review the literature examining the validity and significance of cannabis withdrawal syndrome. Findings from animal laboratory research are briefly reviewed, and human laboratory and clinical studies are surveyed in more detail. Converging evidence from basic laboratory and clinical studies indicates that a withdrawal syndrome reliably follows discontinuation of chronic heavy use of cannabis or tetrahydrocannabinol. Common symptoms are primarily emotional and behavioral, although appetite change, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
355
2
20

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(397 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(115 reference statements)
20
355
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…First, since participants were tested after 24 h of abstinence, it is unclear whether THC withdrawal may have accounted for the observed findings. However, most heavy cannabis users do not display peak withdrawal symptoms until 2-3 days following the cessation of use (Budney et al, 2004), which most likely precludes the possibility that the current results were due to cannabis withdrawal. However, a related confound is that participants in the current experiment were not monitored during the 24 h abstinence window.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…First, since participants were tested after 24 h of abstinence, it is unclear whether THC withdrawal may have accounted for the observed findings. However, most heavy cannabis users do not display peak withdrawal symptoms until 2-3 days following the cessation of use (Budney et al, 2004), which most likely precludes the possibility that the current results were due to cannabis withdrawal. However, a related confound is that participants in the current experiment were not monitored during the 24 h abstinence window.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We aimed to exclude any cannabis users exhibiting the cannabis withdrawal syndrome, which has been identified in a subset of very frequent (i.e., daily) cannabis users, beginning as early as 5 to 6 h after last use and lasting up to several weeks in the presence of abstinence (Budney et al 2004). Participants identified as daily cannabis users on the TLFB, and who last used cannabis more than 5 h previously, were administered a modified, interviewer-rated version of the Cannabis Withdrawal Checklist (Budney et al 1999) to rule out the presence of cannabis withdrawal syndrome.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since marijuana withdrawal was not formally measured in this study, it is certainly possible that subjects were experiencing symptoms of marijuana withdrawal (which include GI discomfort) during the trial when they tried to stop or cut down (Budney et al, 2004) Although marijuana use did not significantly decline during the trial, any attempt to cut down or stop marijuana use may have resulted in withdrawal symptoms. It is known that marijuana (through CB1 activity) can reduce gut motility and thereby prolong exposure of atomoxetine to gastrointestinal mucosa, possibly leading to GI irritation that could further compound withdrawal related GI symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%