The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.3151/jact.14.368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the Current State of Knowledge on the Effects of Radiation on Concrete

Abstract: A review of the current state of knowledge on the effects of radiation on concrete in nuclear power production applications is presented. Emphasis is placed on the effects of radiation damage, as reflected by changes in engineering properties of concrete, in the evaluation of the long-term operation and for plant life or aging management of nuclear power plants (NPPs) in Japan, Spain, and the United States. National issues and concerns are described for Japan and the United States followed by a discussion of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained neutron fluence value is in accordance with the limit value for the fast neutrons proposed by United States Nuclear Regulatory Committee, (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2016), and the new reference value proposed in Japan for the fast neutron fluence, (Maruyama et al, 2017), which is equal to 1•10 19 n/cm 2 . Here it should be noted that the biological shield of some PWR reactors which are used in the USA and Japan is not only a shielding structure but also a load-bearing structure, (Rosseel et al, 2016). Therefore, its damage or displacement may result in serious consequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained neutron fluence value is in accordance with the limit value for the fast neutrons proposed by United States Nuclear Regulatory Committee, (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2016), and the new reference value proposed in Japan for the fast neutron fluence, (Maruyama et al, 2017), which is equal to 1•10 19 n/cm 2 . Here it should be noted that the biological shield of some PWR reactors which are used in the USA and Japan is not only a shielding structure but also a load-bearing structure, (Rosseel et al, 2016). Therefore, its damage or displacement may result in serious consequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While deteriorations of concrete structures have been extensively researched in civil engineering field, there still remains the characteristic deterioration environment, i.e., irradiation, fully unexploited in NPPs (Rosseel et al 2016). Biological shielding concrete walls (in case of a pressurized water reactor; PWR) or reactor vessel support pedestals (in case of a boiling water reactor; BWR) are irradiated by neutrons and gamma rays from the reactor during operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nuclear applications, the study of irradiation effects on minerals and ceramics is motivated by two issues: (1) finding sustainable encapsulation matrix for radiological waste forms and Pu surplus, and, (2) assessing the long-term operation and the structural significance of exposing the concrete of nuclear power plant to high levels of neutron and gamma radiation, e.g., (Dubrovskii et al 1967;Kontani et al 2010;Rosseel et al 2016).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%