2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised water systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(69 reference statements)
7
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite some households being resistant to 666 using rainwater indoors (Mankad et al, 2011), it is now acknowledged that RWH is an acceptable 667 source of non-potable water compared to other types of water reuse for non-potable purposes …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some households being resistant to 666 using rainwater indoors (Mankad et al, 2011), it is now acknowledged that RWH is an acceptable 667 source of non-potable water compared to other types of water reuse for non-potable purposes …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also other scholars devoted to discovering the differences at the individual level and predicting the reusability of reclaimed water. Some social demography statistical indicators, such as gender, age, and academic level, are found to be accurate indicators for predicting the degree of the public's perception regarding the risk of reclaimed water reuse [9]. In sociological studies, the aversion to reclaimed water has been found to be positively correlated with the degree of political conservatism [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the measures are evaluated by their level of centralization in terms of water systems: centralized/decentralized and formal/informal. While decentralized measures are autonomous entities acting in the same direction, centralized measures act as a whole and are dependent one of each other [21]. The formal/informal couple refers to a network put in place in order for the measure to be implemented and it varies from a hierarchical organization to an ad-hoc creative network [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%