2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.teac.2020.e00098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of separation methods for the determination of ammonium/ammonia in natural water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After characterizing the capacitance response in the trap solution of 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 , we compared capacitive detection with conductivity detection in terms of their responses to varying background sulfuric acid concentrations. Comparing the two detection methods provides a better understanding of the implementation potential of capacitive detection because conductivity is a more common and currently more convenient method in many detection applications (i.e., many conductivity sensors exist) 32 . The primary drawback of conductivity is its direct link with total ion concentration, such as the background sulfuric acid concentration in the trap solution, which limits sensor sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After characterizing the capacitance response in the trap solution of 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 , we compared capacitive detection with conductivity detection in terms of their responses to varying background sulfuric acid concentrations. Comparing the two detection methods provides a better understanding of the implementation potential of capacitive detection because conductivity is a more common and currently more convenient method in many detection applications (i.e., many conductivity sensors exist) 32 . The primary drawback of conductivity is its direct link with total ion concentration, such as the background sulfuric acid concentration in the trap solution, which limits sensor sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging selective TAN separations to enable capacitive nitrogen detection in simplified water matrices represents an underexplored and promising direction. 32 We have recently developed a new selective separation method, electrochemical stripping (ECS), to separate TAN from complex waters into a simple acidic matrix. 33 ECS has been demonstrated to extract high-purity TAN from several complex water (e.g., urine, anaerobic digestate) into a sulfuric acid trap solution with over 99% selectivity, leveraging the volatility of TAN and electrochemical pH adjustment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon may be elucidated from the different free ammonia concentration in both reactors, which were 180 mg NH3-N/L and 76 mg NH3-N/L for C/N = 20 and C/N = 30 respectively at day 14. At higher pH, the presence of ammonia is more dominant than ammonium [23]. Therefore, the ammonia existence was possible in both reactors as the achieved turned back pH to the same range, 6.6 -7.1.…”
Section: Nitrogen Transformationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…samples with concentrations ranging from 0.1 mg/L to 1000 µg/L (Standard Test Methods for Iron in Water) On the other hand, ammonia is a highly soluble substance and difficult to remove, causing toxicity to living organisms and harming the environment (Yan et al, 2020). As a result, efforts are made to advance the development of methods for the detection and quantification of ammonia dissolved in water (Standard Test Methods for Ammonia Nitrogen In Water), but also ways to mitigate environmental pollution (Hasanoĝlu et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%