2016
DOI: 10.5195/jwsr.2016.651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Philip McMichael's Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This contribution has explored the everday dynamics of the contemporary food regime through a fieldwork‐based case study of booming maize cultivation in Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, South India. Through this case, I have been seeking to contribute to recent scholarship that calls for reworking food regime analysis to be able to account for cases below the “global” level, including regional, national, and even local cases (McMichael, ; Otero, ; Otero, Pechlaner, & Gürcan, ; Rioux, ; Wang, ). Taking the industrial grain‐oilseed‐livestock complex (Weis, , ) as a key site of ongoing food regime restructuring, I have argued for seeing the expansion of maize as an apt example of the integration of new crops and regions, or expansion of, the contemporary food regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contribution has explored the everday dynamics of the contemporary food regime through a fieldwork‐based case study of booming maize cultivation in Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, South India. Through this case, I have been seeking to contribute to recent scholarship that calls for reworking food regime analysis to be able to account for cases below the “global” level, including regional, national, and even local cases (McMichael, ; Otero, ; Otero, Pechlaner, & Gürcan, ; Rioux, ; Wang, ). Taking the industrial grain‐oilseed‐livestock complex (Weis, , ) as a key site of ongoing food regime restructuring, I have argued for seeing the expansion of maize as an apt example of the integration of new crops and regions, or expansion of, the contemporary food regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate has included criticism of much existing food regime literature for operating with too broad and “top‐down” analytics in part a consequence of its “global” orientation to capital accumulation. Indeed, there is a consensus of sorts calling for reworking the food regime approach to be able to account for cases at the regional, national, or local scale (Jakobsen, , ; McMichael, ; Otero, ; Otero, Pechlaner & Gürcan, 2013; Rioux, ; Wang, ). These limitations to the food regime approach have, in Bernstein's () view, revealed “the need for it to connect with other currents of agrarian political economy” (p. 643).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly valued for its ability to explore 'the dialectical relationship existing between place-specific agricultural production and world market processes of circulation' (Rioux 2017, 1), food regime analysis has nevertheless focused predominantly on North/South dynamics, including the crucial role of Western corporate power and interests to institutional orders such as the GATT and WTO as key 'organizing principles' in giving shape to the contemporary 'corporate food regime' (McMichael 2005(McMichael , 2009). Yet recently scholars working within this approach have started to call for the need to rework it in order to be able to incorporate emerging reorientations in the global political economy towards multipolarity, including rethinking the very notion of Along these lines, we find recent attempts to depart from the 'relative scalar fixity' (Rioux 2017, 1) inherent to the 'global' orientation of most existing food regime literature in order to explore more detailed empirical cases at lower scales of analysis (Jakobsen 2018 a, b;Otero 2016;Otero et al 2013). Relevant to our purposes, we find calls for 'regional food regime analysis' (McMichael 2013; Wang 2018) for studying emerging dynamics beneath the global scale.…”
Section: Towards a Polycentric Food Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otero (2016) señala que el trabajo de Philip McMichael postula que el análisis del "régimen alimentario" está abierto al escrutinio y la extensión por parte de otros académicos. En su propia revisión se pregunta Otero por la reserva que tuvo McMichael en llamar al tercer régimen como "neoliberal" en vez de "financiero", puesto que los mecanismos por los cuales surgen son políticos, la globalización neoliberal que invierte la lógica del segundo régimen dejando entrever que ahora los Estados sirven a los mercados globales.…”
unclassified