Review of Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment: Coupling Development Perspective

Abstract

Two methods of natural ecosystem assessment—emergy analysis (EMA) and life cycle assessment (LCA)—are reviewed in this paper. Their advantages, disadvantages, and application areas are summarized, and the similarities and differences between these two evaluation methods are analyzed respectively. Their research progress is also sorted out. The study finds that EMA and LCA share common attributes in evaluation processes and research fields, but they focus on different aspects of macrocosms and microcosms. The assessment of system sustainability is valued by both EMA and LCA, but the former has unique advantages in natural system input analysis, and the latter is more convincing in assessing environmental loading capacity. If the system boundaries of the two methods are expanded, in other words, factors such as ecosystem services, labor, and infrastructure construction are integrated into the upstream of the target system, and environmental impact is further analyzed using LCA in the downstream of the system, the two approaches would complete each other. The quantified results would be more objective. Therefore, these two theories have the necessity of coupling development. After reviewing recent coupling application cases, the results show that LCA and EMA have commonality in the upstream of the target system (mainly in inventory database construction), while the environmental impact assessment methods are different in the downstream. So the overall coupling analysis method is not formed. The current paper gives rational suggestions on the coupling development of the two systems in terms of the aggregate emergy flow table, the indicator system construction and indicator evaluation methods. In addition, it is necessary to introduce sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis in order to improve the reliability of assessment results. At present, the research on the coupling development of the two theories is in rapid development stage, but there are still many problems that need further exploration.

Production of Biofuels from Biomass as an Approach Towards Sustainable Development: A Short Review

“…Models and computational tools at different sizes of operations have been developed and used thanks to recent breakthroughs in biofuels research. A few examples are LCA models, crop simulations, process design simulations, large-scale crop models, and mathematical optimization tools [96]. Each of these reports adds new information to the conversation about biofuels' long-term viability.…”

Beyond Energy Efficiency in Building Sustainability: A Review of Emergy and Information for Systemically Characterizing Building Performance

“…More importantly, because of the inherent "external (or input/output (I/O)-oriented)" and donor-side perspective [140], emergy lacks the insight to investigate a full spectrum of the internal performance (e.g., energy interaction among components) or emission [141]. For maximizing power, empower tends to exhibit large unsteady fluctuations, but Odum [36,43] argues that system performance is predictable only by identifying external source availability.…”

Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature

“…For this reason, these approaches are usually integrated, such as Arbault et al [56] who used EF, LCA, and emergy; Sheng et al [57] used the concepts of exergy and EF in emergy analysis, and Meng et al [58] used exergy and LCA, based on EME methodology. A more detailed analysis of the potential use of LCA and emergy can be found in Rugani and Benetto [39] and Wang et al [59]. McDougall et al [60] and Yang et al [61] used indicators obtained through EME and the ecological footprint in agriculture systems with an urban impact.…”