2016
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1210055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Different Pushover Analysis Methods Applied to Masonry Buildings and Comparison with Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

Abstract: This paper presents the comparison among different nonlinear seismic analysis methods applied to masonry buildings, i.e. pushover analyses with invariant lateral force distributions, adaptive pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic analysis. The study focuses on the influence of lateral force distribution on the results of the pushover analysis. Two simple benchmark case studies are considered for the purpose of the research, i.e. a four-wall masonry building prototype without floor rigid diaphragms and a two-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety assessment of this structure in its current state was carried out in this study using a force based method by means of pushover analyses. In this case, the horizontal forces adopted to represent the seismic action were proportional to the mass, independently from their height distribution in the structure, since good correlations have been found in terms of capacity between mass proportional pushover analysis and time history analysis in previous studies performed on historical constructions [14]. The results obtained from the pushover analyses were used to verify the structural performance by means of verification of base shear and the estimation of failure mechanisms with their damage distribution.…”
Section: Nonlinear Static Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety assessment of this structure in its current state was carried out in this study using a force based method by means of pushover analyses. In this case, the horizontal forces adopted to represent the seismic action were proportional to the mass, independently from their height distribution in the structure, since good correlations have been found in terms of capacity between mass proportional pushover analysis and time history analysis in previous studies performed on historical constructions [14]. The results obtained from the pushover analyses were used to verify the structural performance by means of verification of base shear and the estimation of failure mechanisms with their damage distribution.…”
Section: Nonlinear Static Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EC8-1 (CEN, 2004) recommends applying at least two distributions of lateral loads: uniform -proportional to the mass, and modal -proportional to the fundamental mode shape. Several authors do not recommend the use of a modal distribution for the analysis of URM buildings with flexible diaphragms, mainly due to the low mass participation involved in the first modes of vibration of the structure (Marino et al, 2018;Lourenço et al, 2011;Endo et al, 2017). A possible alternative is the use of the inverse-triangular load distribution -proportional to the product between the mass and the height of the node -because it assures that the seismic masses in all parts of the building are involved in the pushover analysis (Lagomarsino and Cattari, 2015;Cattari et al, 2015).…”
Section: Definition Of the Capacity By Non-linear Static Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the current damage of the Armenian Church and to assess its structural behavior, non-linear analyses were first performed for vertical and horizon- tal loading following a mass-proportional load-pattern approach, independently from their height distribution in the structure, since good correlations have been found in terms of capacity between mass proportional pushover analysis and time history analysis in previous studies performed on historical constructions [Endo et al, 2017], [Peña et al, 2010]. The full Newton-Raphson method, based on an energy convergence control with tolerance 10 -3 , was adopted for solving the non-linear problems arising from the equilibrium and compatibility conditions.…”
Section: Non-linear Safety Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%