2017
DOI: 10.1049/hve.2017.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of different fault detection methods and their impact on pre‐emptive VSC‐HVDC dc protection performance

Abstract: Multi-terminal voltage-sourced converters (VSC) high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission system is expected to play a vital role in future power systems. Compared with ac power transmission, dc transmission is more vulnerable to faults due to low dc-side impedances and sensitive power electronics in the converters. Dc protection issues must be tackled before any multi-terminal VSC-HVDC grid can be built. The multi-terminal VSC-HVDC system is studied in detail using switching models for two-level convert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over current protection is also being used for fault estimation in MT-HVdc systems [112,113]. In this technique, value of the current is measured and observed.…”
Section: Non-traveling Wave (Ntw) Methods Based On Over Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over current protection is also being used for fault estimation in MT-HVdc systems [112,113]. In this technique, value of the current is measured and observed.…”
Section: Non-traveling Wave (Ntw) Methods Based On Over Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle is the same as in overcurrent method, but the magnitude of the derivative of the current is used instead. However, the method is susceptible to noise and might suffer from the collection of incorrect data samples [12]. Moreover, di/dt for remote internal faults with large fault resistance may be lower than di/dt for external faults [13].…”
Section: DC Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After identification of the fault section, the proposed fault location method can be implemented. First, using Equation (12), the distance from P 1 (P f ) is calculated by l = 240 + 2.9242 × 10 5 × (10.295 − 10.570) × 10 −3 2 = 79.792km (18) where L PfPs = 240 km and L PfO = 130 km. According to the proposed fault location method, the marginal errors 0.5%L PfO = 0.65 and ∆ = 50.208 > 0.65 are calculated in this case.…”
Section: Test Case 1: Ag Fault In Overhead Line Segmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the application of high-frequency transient recorders (TRs), traveling-wave methods have become more widely used in practice [17]. Different fault detection methods and their impact are reviewed in terms of protection performance in [18]. Wavelet transform has proved to be the best option for fault detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%