1976
DOI: 10.2172/7107167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of decision methodologies for evaluating regulatory actions affecting public health and safety. [Nuclear industry site selection]

Abstract: Much attention has recently been given to the a c t i v i t i e s of Federal regulatory agencies. Elected representatives, commentators, and others are asking whether the agencies really a c t entirely in the public i n t e r e s t and whether the benefits to the public a r e worth the costs of regulation. Regulatory reform i s the term usually applied to t h i s concern.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al, 1976, Lindell and Earle, 1980. Information obtained can be used almost directly or incorporated in formal decision methodologies, e.g., utility methods (see Hendrickson et. al, 1976 andEdwards, 1977).…”
Section: Expressed Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al, 1976, Lindell and Earle, 1980. Information obtained can be used almost directly or incorporated in formal decision methodologies, e.g., utility methods (see Hendrickson et. al, 1976 andEdwards, 1977).…”
Section: Expressed Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%