2020
DOI: 10.1109/jas.2020.1003024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of antiswing control of shipboard cranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the complexity of their implementation and the requirement for detailed modelling of the crane-ship system, it is not apparent how to apply these systems to actual marine cranes in use in industry, which will experience six degrees-of-freedom for the ship itself, along with often at least five or more degreesof-freedom for the crane, not to mention actuator dynamics, double pendulum effects, and other complexities. These same conclusions were reached by Cao and Li [CL20] in their 2020 review of shipboard anti-sway control, where they also found that consideration of high-DOF cranes is lacking. In addition, Cao and Li found that, as was identified by Ramli et al, few researchers consider the effect of the double pendulum dynamics between the hook and payload.…”
Section: Anti-sway Control In the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the complexity of their implementation and the requirement for detailed modelling of the crane-ship system, it is not apparent how to apply these systems to actual marine cranes in use in industry, which will experience six degrees-of-freedom for the ship itself, along with often at least five or more degreesof-freedom for the crane, not to mention actuator dynamics, double pendulum effects, and other complexities. These same conclusions were reached by Cao and Li [CL20] in their 2020 review of shipboard anti-sway control, where they also found that consideration of high-DOF cranes is lacking. In addition, Cao and Li found that, as was identified by Ramli et al, few researchers consider the effect of the double pendulum dynamics between the hook and payload.…”
Section: Anti-sway Control In the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A significant concern with the anti-sway systems developed in the literature is the lack of consideration for real-time input from an operator; as was also identified by Cao and Li [CL20], few researchers even consider a time-varying payload trajectory, let alone how an operator would interact with the system. While consideration of operator commands has been seen in the design of input shapers, which shape the operator's commands using a delay based on the natural frequency of the system, they are they are not commonly seen in the shipboard crane anti-sway literature, especially for high-DOF cranes.…”
Section: The Human Factors Of Anti-sway Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the movement of loads with distributed mass, for example, in the form of a beam, is of much greater interest. Such problems in flat design are considered in works [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem State-mentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a DP system to be effective, it is required to counteract the effect of external environmental forces such as wind and waves [2][3][4][5]. While attempting the positioning task, a DP system is subjected to a wide variety of uncertainty [6], such as the crane load [7]. For construction vessels such as dredgers, heavy-lift vessels, and pipe-laying vessels, additional uncertainties arise: in particular, uncertainties from unmodelled dynamics of the propulsion system and unmodelled forces become crucial during offshore heavy lift operation (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%