2017
DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.2.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: Marine Seismic And Side-Scan Sonar Investigations For Seabed Identification With Sonar System

Abstract: Marine seismic reflection data have been collected for decades and since the mid-to late-1980s much of this data is positioned relatively accurately. Marine geophysical acquisition of data is a very expensive process with the rates regularly ship through dozens of thousands of euros per day. Acquisition of seismic profiles has the position is determined by a DGPS system and navigation is performed by Hypack and Maxview software that also gives all the offsets for the equipment employed in the survey. Examples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Officially, DGPS must ensure a measurement precision (p = 0·95) of up to 10 m in a horizontal plane in accordance with a standard issued by the International Association of Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) (IALA, 2004). However, in reality, DGPS systems, as has been mentioned before, enable positioning with an accuracy considerably exceeding that of unaugmented GPS, which enables its use, for example, in the location of mobile devices (Ji et al, 2015; Yoon et al, 2016), marine navigation, and in coastal navigation and in dynamic vessel positioning (Chen et al, 2009; Kim, 2014; Moore et al, 2001), in precision farming for reliable yield mapping or crop soil variability (Liu et al, 2015), in hydrography for positioning of acoustic systems (Lubis et al, 2017; Ratheesh et al, 2018; Ward et al, 2016) in autonomous vehicle positioning (Rathour et al, 2017; Ssebazza and Pan, 2015; Vetrella et al, 2016), and in studying glacier changes (Muhammad and Tian, 2015) and in, for example, dam displacements (Galan-Martin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Officially, DGPS must ensure a measurement precision (p = 0·95) of up to 10 m in a horizontal plane in accordance with a standard issued by the International Association of Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) (IALA, 2004). However, in reality, DGPS systems, as has been mentioned before, enable positioning with an accuracy considerably exceeding that of unaugmented GPS, which enables its use, for example, in the location of mobile devices (Ji et al, 2015; Yoon et al, 2016), marine navigation, and in coastal navigation and in dynamic vessel positioning (Chen et al, 2009; Kim, 2014; Moore et al, 2001), in precision farming for reliable yield mapping or crop soil variability (Liu et al, 2015), in hydrography for positioning of acoustic systems (Lubis et al, 2017; Ratheesh et al, 2018; Ward et al, 2016) in autonomous vehicle positioning (Rathour et al, 2017; Ssebazza and Pan, 2015; Vetrella et al, 2016), and in studying glacier changes (Muhammad and Tian, 2015) and in, for example, dam displacements (Galan-Martin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DGPS system can be used as an alternative to GNSS geodetic networks. It is still, in many places, the basic positioning system used in hydrographic measurements [45][46][47][48]. Officially, the DGPS system must ensure a measurement precision (p = 0.95) of up to 10 m in a horizontal plane in accordance with a standard issued by the International Association of Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) [49].…”
Section: Hydrographic Depth Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the structure of a water body is obtained by taking hydrographic surveys [5][6]. Data recorded during the depth soundings have a direct impact on the safety of navigating vessels in approach lanes and ports [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%