2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
259
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
12
259
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of cooperation has a long tradition in biology [Nowak 2006]. Public goods games in biology have been reviewed recently [for well-mixed populations: Archetti & Scheuring 2012; for spatially structured populations: Perc et al 2013].…”
Section: Public Goods In Evolutionary Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of cooperation has a long tradition in biology [Nowak 2006]. Public goods games in biology have been reviewed recently [for well-mixed populations: Archetti & Scheuring 2012; for spatially structured populations: Perc et al 2013].…”
Section: Public Goods In Evolutionary Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomlinson [1997] and Tomlinson & Bodmer [1997] used the hawk-dove game, to explain why game theory can be used to understand conflict and cooperation between cancer cells; subsequent papers [Bach et al 2001, Dingli et al 2009, Basanta et al 2008a,b, 2011, 2012, Gerstung et al 2011 have extended that model to up to 4 strategies. 2-player games, however, are not appropriate to study collective interactions and can lead to misunderstandings [Archetti & Scheuring 2012]. The approach described here is more appropriate to the study of growth factor production in cancer cell populations.…”
Section: Further Developments Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, because the products of glycolysis act as diffusible public goods, glycolysis should be modeled as a public goods game, rather than as a game with pairwise interactions; games with pairwise interactions, even when multiple interactions are allowed, do not generally have the same results as multi-player, collective action (public goods) games. An important difference is that, while in two-player nonlinear games the maximum benefit for the population is achieved when all players cooperate, in multi-player games the best outcome for the population is achieved at intermediate frequencies of cooperators (Archetti and Scheuring, 2012). This, as we will see, has important implications for the dynamics of potential therapies based on the modification of acidosis.…”
Section: Glycolysis As a Public Goods Gamementioning
confidence: 92%
“…While linear effects are more amenable to analytical study, it is known that most growth factors have a nonlinear, often sigmoid, effect on cell proliferation, and that nonlinear effects can lead to very different dynamics [25,26]. We decided, therefore, to analyse tumor-stroma interactions using a multiplayer public goods game with nonlinear benefits, sacrificing analytical tractability for the sake of realism.…”
Section: From Two-player Games To Collective Interactions With Nonlinmentioning
confidence: 99%