2010
DOI: 10.1177/1464700110376282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review Article: The child/the future

Abstract: £10 (pbk) Children show the strangest things to theorists who pay attention. The figure of the child often indicates spontaneity, innocence and originality as well as pure simplicity and imitation. The child can represent freedom from the self-consciousness, sexuality and seriousness associated with adulthood: a natural state that is accessible to the adult imagination but, because it is simply 'there', is difficult to examine critically. The books discussed here are part of a scholarly move to examine this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(p. vii). The child-future join has been problematized in childhood studies (e.g., Barnsley, 2010;Kraftl, 2020;Taylor, 2017), including how "children of color are not fetishized in the ways white children are in hopeful imaginations of the future" (Joo, 2018, p. 5). 1 Nevertheless, just like the kind of postapocalyptic blockbusters alluded to above, it is "not sufficient to renounce or denounce the child" because the child figure continues to do important work in the making of worlds (Sheldon, 2016, p. 21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. vii). The child-future join has been problematized in childhood studies (e.g., Barnsley, 2010;Kraftl, 2020;Taylor, 2017), including how "children of color are not fetishized in the ways white children are in hopeful imaginations of the future" (Joo, 2018, p. 5). 1 Nevertheless, just like the kind of postapocalyptic blockbusters alluded to above, it is "not sufficient to renounce or denounce the child" because the child figure continues to do important work in the making of worlds (Sheldon, 2016, p. 21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%