“…We quite literally enliven and erase childhoods based on with whom, how, why and with what pedagogies (and worlds) we do citational practices, be these citational practices directly citing child development literature or citational entanglements grounded in or in denial of developmental logics. This is especially true in the context of interrogating how citational practices perpetuate the logics of child development: citing with the certainty, status, violences and spurious interpretative validity assumed by developmental psychology shapes childhoods differently than doing citational practices with speculation (Ashton, 2020), refusal (Nxumalo, 2021b), anti-colonial futurities (Tuck and Gaztambide-Fernández, 2013) and in the collapse of child development's image of the romanticized, apolitical child (Garlen, 2021; Nxumalo et al, 2018; Templeton and Cheruvu, 2020). Burman (2022: 274) continues: ‘[found childhood] identifies childhood as both constitutive of, and as a critical practice of reading and critically reflecting upon, such sociomaterial practices’.…”