2009
DOI: 10.2193/2007-566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and Meta‐Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success

Abstract: Description User-friendly general package providing standard methods for metaanalysis and supporting Schwarzer, Carpenter, and Rücker ,``Meta-Analysis with R'' (2015): -fixed effect and random effects meta-analysis; -several plots (forest, funnel, Galbraith / radial, L'Abbe, Baujat, bubble); -statistical tests and trim-and-fill method to evaluate bias in meta-analysis; -import data from 'RevMan 5'; -prediction interval, Hartung-Knapp and Paule-Mandel method for random effects mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
117
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(87 reference statements)
5
117
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several systems were custom built by Fuhrman Diversified, Inc. (FIELDCAM Miniature Digital SD4TLV; Seabrook, Texas, USA) and several were built by us using a design developed by F. R. Thompson III and W. A. Cox. As recommended by Richardson et al (2009), our cameras were small, highly camouflaged, placed so as to avoid manipulating nest concealment, widely dispersed (i.e., camera-monitored nests were not clumped within a Note: Numbers of nests monitored annually are indicated in parentheses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several systems were custom built by Fuhrman Diversified, Inc. (FIELDCAM Miniature Digital SD4TLV; Seabrook, Texas, USA) and several were built by us using a design developed by F. R. Thompson III and W. A. Cox. As recommended by Richardson et al (2009), our cameras were small, highly camouflaged, placed so as to avoid manipulating nest concealment, widely dispersed (i.e., camera-monitored nests were not clumped within a Note: Numbers of nests monitored annually are indicated in parentheses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the rural-to-urban gradient, nests with cameras had similar visitation/check rates, and this reduces the possibility of bias. Although a recent metaanalysis suggests that camera-monitored nests may be relatively less likely to be depredated than unmonitored nests (Richardson et al 2009), we used nest cameras, not to estimate risk of predation, but to identify the suite of nest predators Burhans 2003, Reidy et al 2008). We do not expect that our estimates of overall predation are affected by our use of cameras given that the number of nests with cameras was small relative to the total number of nests that we monitored (,3%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early clutches had higher chances of survival owing to the later emergence of desert monitors (n = 58 monitor observations, first date = 15 April, median date = 13 May), with chances of nest success decreasing by almost 50 % by the end of the season, coinciding with the peak of monitor activity in May-June (Pianka et al 2004). As the number of active nests diminishes towards the end of the breeding period, finding new nests by tracking becomes extremely difficult, with smaller sample sizes in the first 3 years of study limiting our ability to detect any increase in late-season nest survival.…”
Section: Effect Of Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation is that hillocks and elevations probably do not provide much additional concealment against major predators for incubating females. Foxes, being mostly nocturnal, rely on smell or sound when foraging, while in shrubby desert, diurnal monitor lizards, although thought to have excellent vision like other Varanus (Pianka et al 2004), seem more likely to detect a nest or a female at relatively close range, so nesting in a depression between hillocks or in a flat area may have similar costs for nest survival.…”
Section: Habitat Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incubation and brood care are thought to place parent birds at greater predation risk (Vehrencamp 1978, Hartke et al 2006, Low et al 2010), but mortality of parents is much harder to document than mortality of sedentary eggs or prefledged young, and so these risks have not been well documented. Determining event-specific mortality among breeding adults generally requires techniques such as telemetry or video surveillance (Hartke et al 2006, Reidy et al 2009), which often precludes large samples and raises concerns that the methodologies themselves may affect mortality risks (Richardson et al 2009, Barron et al 2010. Nevertheless, breeding birds spend several weeks in fixed locations, i.e., nest sites, tending eggs and young, and for species that suffer high rates of nest predation this undoubtedly places them at greater risk to predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%