2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00257-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
646
1
12

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,073 publications
(706 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
646
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…A novel sensitivity analysis method was used for the models (Gevrey et al, 2003;Olden et al, 2004), which is simple and effective in identifying key variables. The method is introduced as follows:…”
Section: Predicting Important Variables Via Sensitivity Analysis and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel sensitivity analysis method was used for the models (Gevrey et al, 2003;Olden et al, 2004), which is simple and effective in identifying key variables. The method is introduced as follows:…”
Section: Predicting Important Variables Via Sensitivity Analysis and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the "very black-box" nature of feed-forward neural networks ob- scures the meaning of the parameters and, despite the several attempts done in the literature, it is not easy to evaluate the importance of the different variables; furthermore, the different methodologies suitable to this end may lead to inconsistent conclusions (Gevrey et al, 2003).…”
Section: Input Variables Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shojaeefard et al [47] have published the report where there was a similarity between results obtained using the PaD method and the profile method, as well as the classical stepwise method, but the results obtained using the connection weights method were significantly different. Gevrey et al [49] employed several methods of testing the variables contribution to study a brown trout reproduction phenomenon. The results obtained by authors show that more than one method should be used to analyze the contribution of the inputs, and results should be compared because for each method they are not always the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the absolute values of connection weights were used, the same as in work of Gevrey et al [49].…”
Section: Connection Weights Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%