2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00723-008-0073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Modification of Magnetic Properties of Fe3C Nanoparticles by Chemisorption of CO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 As with metallic iron, iron carbides are also known to exhibit ferromagnetism; 3,4 therefore, there have been many studies reported on the ferromagnetism of bulk iron carbides and iron carbide nanoparticles. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The size effect in nanomaterials is also of particular interest because the properties of the bulk materials can be signicantly changed. For example, melting-point depression, 20 catalyst activation, 21 and the alloying of non-mixable metals 22 have been reported to occur as the particle size decreases into the nanosize range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 As with metallic iron, iron carbides are also known to exhibit ferromagnetism; 3,4 therefore, there have been many studies reported on the ferromagnetism of bulk iron carbides and iron carbide nanoparticles. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The size effect in nanomaterials is also of particular interest because the properties of the bulk materials can be signicantly changed. For example, melting-point depression, 20 catalyst activation, 21 and the alloying of non-mixable metals 22 have been reported to occur as the particle size decreases into the nanosize range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† There are several reports for TEM observations of iron carbide nanoparticles larger than 2 nm diameter without atomic-resolution. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Very ne particles dispersed over the carbon support were observed as blurry black dots in the TEM images. The mean particle diameter and standard deviation of the size distribution were estimated to be 0.9 AE 0.2 nm (Fe 12 /C), 1.0 AE 0.3 nm (Fe 28 /C), and 1.3 AE 0.3 nm (Fe 60 /C), respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation