2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible metal ionic catalysts for high-voltage aqueous hybrid zinc-manganese redox flow batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure S3, the cell alternating current (AC) areaspecific resistance (ASR) of the CEM (34.9 Ω cm 2 ) was slightly lower than that of the AEM (46.1 Ω cm 2 ) because the ionic diffusion coefficient of sulfuric acid in the AEM was slower than that in the CEM. 54 As a result, the VE was higher in the CEM. However, the CE and the energy efficiency (EE) of the AEM were relatively higher than those of the CEM because of the alleviated cation crossover (Figure 1e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure S3, the cell alternating current (AC) areaspecific resistance (ASR) of the CEM (34.9 Ω cm 2 ) was slightly lower than that of the AEM (46.1 Ω cm 2 ) because the ionic diffusion coefficient of sulfuric acid in the AEM was slower than that in the CEM. 54 As a result, the VE was higher in the CEM. However, the CE and the energy efficiency (EE) of the AEM were relatively higher than those of the CEM because of the alleviated cation crossover (Figure 1e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Meanwhile, the average discharge voltage of the AEM (1.63 V) was slightly lower than that of the CEM (1.66 V), which could be explained by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). In Figure S3, the cell alternating current (AC) area-specific resistance (ASR) of the CEM (34.9 Ω cm 2 ) was slightly lower than that of the AEM (46.1 Ω cm 2 ) because the ionic diffusion coefficient of sulfuric acid in the AEM was slower than that in the CEM . As a result, the VE was higher in the CEM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the extensively studied AQRFB for ESSs are vanadium-based AQRFBs (VRFBs), 38 iron/chromium-based AQRFBs (Fe-Cr RFBs), 39 zinc/bromine-based AQRFBs (Zn-Br RFB), 40 organic AQRFBs (AORFBs), 41 and hybrid AQRFBs (AHRFBs). 42 Each type possesses its advantages and disadvantages, and continuous research is underway to further enhance the functionality, robustness, and economic viability of AQRFB systems.…”
Section: Aqueous Redox Flow Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double-membrane triple-electrolyte design is also available for Zn–Mn hybrid RFBs, and a battery with an ultrahigh operating voltage of 2.75 V is obtained, opening a new avenue for the development of high energy density Zn–Mn RFBs. 77…”
Section: Inorganic Redox-active Functional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double-membrane triple-electrolyte design is also available for Zn-Mn hybrid RFBs, and a battery with an ultrahigh operating voltage of 2.75 V is obtained, opening a new avenue for the development of high energy density Zn-Mn RFBs. 77 The Ni(OH) 2 /NiOOH redox-active couple can serve as an allsolid non-flow catholyte for Zn-Ni RFBs, using a concentrated Zn(OH) 4…”
Section: àmentioning
confidence: 99%