2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse spillover of avian viral vaccine strains from domesticated poultry to wild birds

Abstract: Transmission of viruses from the commercial poultry to wild birds is an emerging paradigm of livestock-wildlife interface. Here, we report the identification and isolation of vaccine strains of avian paramyxovirus serotype 1 (APMV1) and avian coronaviruses (ACoV) from different wild bird species across eight Egyptian governorates between January 2014 and December 2015. Surveillance of avian respiratory viruses in free-ranging wild birds (n=297) identified three species that harboured or excreted APMV1 and ACoV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence of infections by the IBV vaccine virus or the infectious IBV strain to birds of other species has been reported before. Reverse spillover of the vaccine virus from domesticated birds to wild birds has been proposed by Devlin et al [5] and Rohaim et al [26]. Our results were similar to the previous study by Ito et al [18], which discovered that IB-like coronavirus from peafowl has close genetic relatedness with the IBV H120 vaccine strain.…”
Section: Isolatesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Evidence of infections by the IBV vaccine virus or the infectious IBV strain to birds of other species has been reported before. Reverse spillover of the vaccine virus from domesticated birds to wild birds has been proposed by Devlin et al [5] and Rohaim et al [26]. Our results were similar to the previous study by Ito et al [18], which discovered that IB-like coronavirus from peafowl has close genetic relatedness with the IBV H120 vaccine strain.…”
Section: Isolatesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A relatively recent area of research at livestock-species interface is the spillover of viruses from the fared poultry into wild birds that can risk the wild birds' welfare. In commercial poultry farms, vaccination may have a significant effect on virus evolution [20] and possible spread to wild birds in vicinity [21,22]. Several spillover events of vaccine viruses from domestic poultry to wild birds have been reported such as Newcastle disease virus and infectious bronchitis virus [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In commercial poultry farms, vaccination may have a significant effect on virus evolution [ 20 ] and possible spread to wild birds in vicinity [ 21 , 22 ]. Several spillover events of vaccine viruses from domestic poultry to wild birds have been reported such as Newcastle disease virus and infectious bronchitis virus [ 21 , 22 ]. Owing to high demands for free-range and backyard poultry production, the direct interaction between wild birds and farmed poultry is increasing [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple vaccination regimens coupled with mass employment of live avulavirus 1 vaccine (e.g., LaSota) increases the probability of its spill-over (Devlin et al, 2016;Rohaim et al, 2017). Such spill-over may enhance additional events such as reversion of virulence and recombination with wild-type strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such spill-over may enhance additional events such as reversion of virulence and recombination with wild-type strain. A study reported the spill-over of LaSota strain into wild birds (Snoeck et al, 2013) because LaSota is most common vaccine strain being used worldwide (Martinez et al, 2017, Akhtar, et al, 2017 and, therefore, has every chance to be shed in environment from vaccinates (Rohaim et al, 2017). Previous studies have suggested that genetic evolution may be a consequence of evasion of immune response induced by vaccine strains or subsequent infection (Qin et al, 2008, Younus, et al, 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%