Reverse flow in academic mobility from core to periphery: motivations of international faculty working in Kazakhstan

Abstract

Through expanding flows of labor and knowledge on a global scale, academics are increasingly mobile as higher education institutions compete for talent that transcends borders. However, talent often flows from the periphery to the core as scholars seek out employment in recognized institutions of higher learning in developed economies. This study examines faculty mobility in a reverse direction: from the core to Kazakhstan, the largest country in Central Asia. What factors persuade faculty members to relocate to Kazakhstan for full-time employment? What types of individuals pursue this relocation? Through interviews with international faculty members based in Kazakhstan, the study identifies push factors that trigger departure from one's previous country of residence: job market, unsatisfactory work conditions, age, and marital status. Alternatively, Kazakhstan attracts scholars via pull factors that include salary, sense of adventure, and the opportunity to build new institutions and programs as well as conduct research. Unlike previous studies that highlight boundaryless mobility and individual agency, this study reveals constraints that mediate international faculty mobility. Furthermore, salary plays a limited role as a pull factor particularly among early career academics who are seeking research opportunities and meaningful contributions in building new academic programs and institutions.

“Knowledge migrants” or “economic migrants”? Patterns of academic mobility and migration from Southern Europe to Mexico

“…According to our interviewees, Mexican academia values foreign degrees and academic experience highly and offers a more meritocratic culture that is not overwhelmingly based on personal connections. The case of Mexico is a good example of the increasing attractiveness of emerging economies for academics and researchers, as recently highlighted by Czaika and Orazbayev (2018) and Lee and Kuzhabekova (2018).…”

“…Among the less tangible factors, the literature on academic mobility has stressed: the individual's preference for adventure and intercultural exposure and a greater than average appetite for life change among academics (Lee & Kuzhabekova, 2018); the possibility of improving performance, visibility, and credibility through mobility and, also, the development of more fruitful patterns of collaboration (Fernandez-Zubieta, Geuna, & Lawson, 2015); the positive symbolic capital-a sort of prestige-associated with international mobility (Bauder et al, 2017); the opportunity to acquire social, cultural, and symbolic capital through the acquisition of new skills and competences, the creation of new networks, and gains in terms of reputation (aka "mobility capital"; Bauder et al, 2017); increased access to international research networks and funding (Cañibano, Otamendi, & Andújar, 2008); "intrinsic rewards": greater work satisfaction, particularly in relation to the working environment, the possibility of collaborating with "star scientists," the possibility of being funded, the freedom in choosing research topics (Pellens, 2012); the institutional framework that eases access to visas, residence permits, and even acquisition of citizenship (Bauder, Lujan, & Hannan, 2018;Komatsu & Staniscia, 2005).…”

The World-Systemic Dynamics of Knowledge Production: The Distribution of Transnational Academic Capital in the Social Sciences

“…It follows that scholars with more academic capital find better positions in the worldsystem in terms of not just symbolic, but economic capital as well. Thus, talent often flows from the periphery to the core as scholars seek out employment in recognized institutions of higher learning in the center (Lee and Kuzhabekova 2017). Mobility-that is, being educated or working abroad raises the symbolic or academic capital of researchers substantially, while immobility often narrows career paths.…”

Theorizing international inequalities in communication and media studies. A field theory approach

“…The general rule of mobility is that talent often flows from the Global South to the core as scholars seek out employment in recognized institutions of higher learning in the Global North (Lee and Kuzhabekova, 2017). Mobility, that is, being educated or work abroad raises the symbolic or academic capital of researchers in a great extent, while immobility often results in narrowed career paths.…”