1995
DOI: 10.1093/neucas/1.1.39-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
231
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
231
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is neuroimaging evidence in favour of concrete and abstract meaning being on a continuum (MartinLoeches et al, 2001) but equally there is also neuroimaging evidence in favour of multiple sites for concrete meaning (West & Holcombe, 2000) or abstract meaning (Kiehl et al, 1999). The third view suggests that abstract and concrete concepts are different in kind; this view appears to have currency only within neuropsychology and, as Breedin et al (1994) report, largely ignored elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is neuroimaging evidence in favour of concrete and abstract meaning being on a continuum (MartinLoeches et al, 2001) but equally there is also neuroimaging evidence in favour of multiple sites for concrete meaning (West & Holcombe, 2000) or abstract meaning (Kiehl et al, 1999). The third view suggests that abstract and concrete concepts are different in kind; this view appears to have currency only within neuropsychology and, as Breedin et al (1994) report, largely ignored elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also administered two synonym triplets tasks [5], one of which varied the grammatical category of the items (nouns and verbs) by trial, while the other varied concreteness. On each trial, R.C.…”
Section: Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between abstract and concrete words is supported by neuropsychological dissociations. There are a number of patients showing a selective impairment for abstract words with concrete words remaining unimpaired (Franklin, 1989;Franklin, Hoard, & Patterson, 1994) and some (although fewer) reports of the opposite pattern (Breedin, Saffran, & Coslett, 1994;Warrington & Shallice, 1984; but see Plaut & Shallice, 1993; for an alternate account).…”
Section: Imageabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%