2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53701-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing universal quantum contextuality through communication games

Abstract: An ontological model of an operational theory is considered to be universally noncontextual if both preparation and measurement noncontextuality assumptions are satisfied in that model. In this report, we first generalize the logical proofs of quantum preparation and measurement contextuality for qubit system for any odd number of preparations and measurements. Based on the logical proof, we derive testable universally non-contextual inequalities violated by quantum theory. We then propose a class of two-party… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ontological model of an operational quantum theory is considered to be preparation non-contextual if two preparation procedures P and P ′ prepare the same density matrix ρ, and no measurement can operationally distinguish the context by which ρ is prepared, i.e. ∀k, M : p(k|P, M) = p(k|P ′ , M) ⇒ ∀λ : µ(λ|ρ, P) = µ(λ|ρ, P ′ ), implying two ontic state distributions are equivalent irrespective of the contexts P and P ′ [71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Elegant Bell Inequality and Its Local And Preparation Non-co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ontological model of an operational quantum theory is considered to be preparation non-contextual if two preparation procedures P and P ′ prepare the same density matrix ρ, and no measurement can operationally distinguish the context by which ρ is prepared, i.e. ∀k, M : p(k|P, M) = p(k|P ′ , M) ⇒ ∀λ : µ(λ|ρ, P) = µ(λ|ρ, P ′ ), implying two ontic state distributions are equivalent irrespective of the contexts P and P ′ [71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Elegant Bell Inequality and Its Local And Preparation Non-co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ontological model of an operational theory can be assumed to be non-contextual in the following way [4]; if two experimental procedures are equivalent in operational theory then they can be represented noncontextually in an ontological model. Then, an ontological model of quantum theory is assumed to be preparation non-contextual if ∀M, k : p(k|P, M ) = p(k|P , M ) ⇒ µ P (λ|ρ) = µ P (λ|ρ) (1) where the ρ is prepared by two distinct preparation procedures P and P [4,33,34]. We shall shortly see that in a preparation non-contextual ontological model the parity-oblivious constraint in a communication game in operational quantum theory implies equivalent obliviousness condition at the level of ontic states.…”
Section: A Operational Theory and Ontological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satisfaction of parityoblivious condition in an operational theory implies that no measurement can distinguish the parity of the inputs. This is regarded as an equivalent class of preparations [64,65,67] which will have equivalent representation at the level of the ontic states. It has been demonstrated in [62] that the parityobliviousness at the operational level must be satisfied at the level of ontic states if the ontological model of quantum theory is preparation non-contextual.…”
Section: Parity-oblivious Random-access-codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this paper, by quantum advantage, we refer to the violation of preparation non-contextuality (unless stated otherwise) but to avoid clumsiness, we skip detailed discussion about it. We refer [62,64,65,67] for detailed discussion about it.…”
Section: Parity-oblivious Random-access-codementioning
confidence: 99%