2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the impact of forest exotic plantations on water yield in large scale watersheds in South-Central Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
83
1
22

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
83
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the relatively sparse canopy of mature P. patula trees, the relatively low ET in the mature P. patula stand was in part attributable to previous selective logging activities that had reduced stand basal area. Thus, from a purely hydrologic services standpoint, planting of native pine trees on degraded pasture areas at this site did not produce a dramatic increase in ET or reductions in water yield, in contrast to findings reported elsewhere (Farley et al 2005, Buytaert et al 2007, Huber et al 2008, Wang et al 2008, Little et al 2009). Notwithstanding, the higher infiltration rates recorded for pine stands versus grazed pasture suggests a positive impact of pine reforestation on soil hydraulic properties, which should enhance subsurface recharge and therefore baseflow as long as ET losses remain comparable (Muñoz-Villers et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition to the relatively sparse canopy of mature P. patula trees, the relatively low ET in the mature P. patula stand was in part attributable to previous selective logging activities that had reduced stand basal area. Thus, from a purely hydrologic services standpoint, planting of native pine trees on degraded pasture areas at this site did not produce a dramatic increase in ET or reductions in water yield, in contrast to findings reported elsewhere (Farley et al 2005, Buytaert et al 2007, Huber et al 2008, Wang et al 2008, Little et al 2009). Notwithstanding, the higher infiltration rates recorded for pine stands versus grazed pasture suggests a positive impact of pine reforestation on soil hydraulic properties, which should enhance subsurface recharge and therefore baseflow as long as ET losses remain comparable (Muñoz-Villers et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…El suministro de agua como servicio ecosistémico depende de la cuenca hidrográfica, lugar donde se conjugan los elementos que conforman un ecosistema y se desarrollan los procesos que la regulan. Por lo tanto, la estructura, funcionamiento y estado de conservación de la cuenca determinarán en qué medida se concreta la provisión de este servicio (Little et al 2009). Las zonas ribereñas, son buena fuente de provisión de agua de mejor calidad, de valor paisajístico y turístico, además de cumplir funciones ecológicas como corredores biológicos y sustentadores de la biodiversidad, lo que las hace elementos claves para apoyar la decisión de protegerlas aún más, diseñando estrategias de manejo destinadas a un uso más eficiente y racional de estos servicios (Fernández et al 2009).…”
Section: Ds Nº 192 De 1998unclassified
“…En este sentido Lara et al (2003Lara et al ( , 2010, Little et al (2009) y Huber et al (2010 han mostrado que las microcuencas con porcentajes mayores de cobertura con plantaciones exóticas, producen un menor caudal estival que las cuencas con una cubierta mayor de especies nativas, afectando actividades productivas. Al respecto, las consecuencias de la introducción de estas especies (exóticas) pueden variar, desde provocar un ligero cambio en la composición de especies, hasta la extinción de plantas nativas, que generaría una profunda modificación del ecosistema (Parker y Reichard 1997, Sirombra y Mesa 2010.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However, in the last four decades they have been replaced by exotic species, mainly Pinus radiata (D. Don) and Eucalyptus globulus (Labill), which have been steadily increased in the Chilean Mediterranean Zone (ChMZ) (Shulz et al 2010(Shulz et al , 2011CONAF 2011). For these species, an increase of up to 53% in the period 1975 -2000 has been registered, with an annual growth that reached 10.5% (Pizarro et al 2006;Little et al 2009) and currently representing more than 17% of the forest area of the country (CONAF 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%