2015
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psv028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing progenitors of type Ia supernovae from their light curves and spectra

Abstract: In the single degenerate (SD) scenario of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), the collision of the ejecta with its companion results in stripping hydrogen rich matter from the companion star.This hydrogen rich matter might leave its trace in the light curves and/or spectra. In this paper, we perform radiation hydrodynamical simulations of this collision for three binary systems. As a result, we find that the emission from the shock-heated region is not as strong as in the previous study. This weak emission, however, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(46 reference statements)
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radio and X-ray observations reported no detection of the SN in these wavelengths which was interpreted as a support for DD scenario for SN 2014J, and was also used to estimate the progenitor mass-loss rate (Pérez-Torres et al 2014;Margutti et al 2014;Nielsen et al 2014). This estimate is in agreement with the upper limits estimated by Kelly et al (2014) using HST data from near-UV to near-NIR and by Lundqvist et al (2015) using late optical spectra (but see Graham et al 2015 for evidence of multiple components of CSM which would favor the SD scenario, and Kutsuna & Shigeyama (2015) who do not rule it out). Interestingly, Crotts (2015) reported the discovery of light-echoes at ∼80 pc from the SN location revealing the CSM structure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Radio and X-ray observations reported no detection of the SN in these wavelengths which was interpreted as a support for DD scenario for SN 2014J, and was also used to estimate the progenitor mass-loss rate (Pérez-Torres et al 2014;Margutti et al 2014;Nielsen et al 2014). This estimate is in agreement with the upper limits estimated by Kelly et al (2014) using HST data from near-UV to near-NIR and by Lundqvist et al (2015) using late optical spectra (but see Graham et al 2015 for evidence of multiple components of CSM which would favor the SD scenario, and Kutsuna & Shigeyama (2015) who do not rule it out). Interestingly, Crotts (2015) reported the discovery of light-echoes at ∼80 pc from the SN location revealing the CSM structure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the CSM-ejecta-interaction scenario, a more extended CSM distribution could generate a brighter flash but with longer diffusion time. Our best-fitting CEI model (Figures 2 & 3) and previous simulations of both two scenarios 8,10,19 all indicate that the particular blue color evolution is inevitable when producing the early flash as bright as that of MUSSES1604D (Extended Data Figure 1), which is incompatible with the red and rapid early color evolution observed for MUSSES1604D.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The interaction of SN ejecta with a non-degenerate companion star 8,18,19 ("companionejecta interaction", CEI) or with dense circumstellar material 9,10 ("CSM-ejecta interaction") are popular scenarios to explain the early optical flash. In order to produce a prominent optical flash comparable to that of MUSSES1604D, either a companion with a very extended envelope or a large-scale CSM distribution is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the early supernova light curve can be brightened by the collision of the supernova ejecta with the companion star (Kasen 2010;Moriya et al 2015;Kutsuna & Shigeyama 2015;Liu et al 2015). Also, the companion star may be significantly heated and shocked by the SN impact, causing the envelope of the companion star to be partially removed due to the stripping and ablation mechanism (Wheeler et al 1975;Fryxell & Arnett 1981;Taam & Fryxell 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%