2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SN 2014J at M82 – I. A middle-class Type Ia supernova by all spectroscopic metrics

Abstract: We present the intensive spectroscopic follow up of the type Ia supernova (SN Ia) 2014J in the starburst galaxy M82. Twenty-seven optical spectra have been acquired from January 22 nd to September 1 st 2014 with the Isaac Newton (INT) and William Herschel (WHT) Telescopes. After correcting the observations for the recession velocity of M82 and for Milky Way and host galaxy extinction, we measured expansion velocities from spectral line blueshifts and pseudo-equivalent width of the strongest features in the spe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SN 2014J was discovered relatively late considering the proximity of its host galaxy, M82, pre-discovery images from surveys do exist and data of the early-time rise of the SN have been analyzed by Zheng et al (2014) and Goobar et al (2014Goobar et al ( , 2015. Because of its closeness at under 4 Mpc (Dalcanton et al 2009), the post-discovery light curve and spectral evolution of this SN have been well-observed in many different wavelength regions (see Ashall et al 2014;Foley et al 2014;Margutti et al 2014;Pérez-Torres et al 2014;Jack et al 2015;Marion et al 2015;Siverd et al 2015;Telesco et al 2015;Galbany et al 2016;Sand et al 2016;Srivastav et al 2016, and many others).…”
Section: Sn 2014j and Observational Evidence For The Progenitor Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although SN 2014J was discovered relatively late considering the proximity of its host galaxy, M82, pre-discovery images from surveys do exist and data of the early-time rise of the SN have been analyzed by Zheng et al (2014) and Goobar et al (2014Goobar et al ( , 2015. Because of its closeness at under 4 Mpc (Dalcanton et al 2009), the post-discovery light curve and spectral evolution of this SN have been well-observed in many different wavelength regions (see Ashall et al 2014;Foley et al 2014;Margutti et al 2014;Pérez-Torres et al 2014;Jack et al 2015;Marion et al 2015;Siverd et al 2015;Telesco et al 2015;Galbany et al 2016;Sand et al 2016;Srivastav et al 2016, and many others).…”
Section: Sn 2014j and Observational Evidence For The Progenitor Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, SN 2014J has been shown to be a fairly standard SN Ia (Galbany et al 2016), which makes it ideal for probing deeper into the underlying physics of the progenitor scenarios and explosions. There are a variety of light curve parameters for SN 2014J depending on the source article.…”
Section: Sn 2014j and Observational Evidence For The Progenitor Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calculating modelled E(B − V ) curves above, SN templates were stretched so that the observed decline rate after interaction with dust matches that inferred for SN 2014J. In particular, following Galbany et al (2016) we averaged four different estimates in the literature (Tsvetkov et al 2014;Ashall et al 2014;Kawabata et al 2014;Marion et al 2015) and use ∆M 14J…”
Section: Sn 2014jmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No such signatures were detected for SNe 1998bu and 2000cx (Lundqvist et al 2013), SN 2001el (Mattila et al 2005, SNe 2005am and 2005cf (Leonard 2007), SN 2012cg , SN 2013gy (Holmbo et al 2018), or SN 2017cbv (Sand et al 2018, nor were they detected by Graham et al (2017) in 8 other SNe Ia. The nearby SNe Ia 2011fe and 2014J were particularly well-studied events (Brown et al 2012;Munari et al 2013;Mazzali et al 2014;Foley et al 2014;Goobar et al 2014;Galbany et al 2016;Vallely et al 2016;Dhawan et al 2018), but they too showed no hydrogen emission in their late-time spectra Lundqvist et al 2015;Sand et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%