1995
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.1995.10524616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealed Preference of the Federal Reserve: Using Inverse-Control Theory to Interpret the Policy Equation of a Vector Autoregression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier work, Salemi (1995) obtains similar results. Unlike Salemi's unconstrained VAR, however, the model presented here adds restrictions that give each equation a structural interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In earlier work, Salemi (1995) obtains similar results. Unlike Salemi's unconstrained VAR, however, the model presented here adds restrictions that give each equation a structural interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…With a slightly different underlying representation of the economy, Cecchetti, Flores-Lagunes, and Krause (2001) find negligible values for sub-samples regarding the '80s and '90s, while Cecchetti and Ehrmann (2001)'s results support a value of about 1/4. For the same period, but with a VAR representation of the economy, Salemi (1995) finds very low relative weights for the output gap with respect to inflation. Finally, Dennis (2003) designs a hybrid representation of the economy, and estimate a value equal to zero.…”
Section: Econometric Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Salemi (1995) identifies the Fed's loss function parameters in the postWorld War II period using a linear quadratic optimal control structure and assuming that the economy can be described by a vector autoregressive (VAR) model. Ozlale (2003) and Dennis (2006) consider that the economy can be described by the model proposed by Rudebusch and Svensson (1999), using an infinite-horizon quadratic loss function and estimating the Fed's preferences by maximum likelihood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%