“…∼ → GL n (F ℘ ) over E, or its locally Q panalytic vectors S(U ℘ , W ℘ )[m ρ ] an , which is an admissible locally Q p -analytic representation of GL n (F ℘ ). When nonzero, these representations of GL n (F ℘ ) are so far only understood when n = 2 and F ℘ = Q p ( [23], [40], [50], [19], [24], [56], [33], [17], ...). Indeed, though these representations are expected to be very rich, many results from GL 2 (Q p ) collapse (see e.g.…”