1996
DOI: 10.2166/wst.1996.0694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reuse of treated sewage effluent for cooling water make up: a feasibility study and a pilot plant study

Abstract: This investigation was aimed at developing an acceptable technology for using secondary effluent as cooling water makeup for inland manufacturing industry in Australia. Approximate economic evaluations were made for a number of pretreatment alternatives and for internal treatment with chemical conditioning agents. Internal treatment with biocide dosing appeared to be the most promising option. A portable pilot plant scale cooling tower/heat exchanger unit was constructed. The unit incorporated an on-line, diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of MWW as cooling water has been studied and implemented for some time. However, previous studies suggested blending freshwater with small proportion of secondary effluent or significant pre-treatment of secondary effluent prior to the addition to recirculating cooling systems (Osborn, 1970;Rebhun and Engel, 1988;Wijesinghe et al, 1996). Only recently has treated secondary effluent been considered a promising alternative as the sole makeup water source for recirculating cooling systems (Hsieh et al, 2010;Li et al, 2011a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of MWW as cooling water has been studied and implemented for some time. However, previous studies suggested blending freshwater with small proportion of secondary effluent or significant pre-treatment of secondary effluent prior to the addition to recirculating cooling systems (Osborn, 1970;Rebhun and Engel, 1988;Wijesinghe et al, 1996). Only recently has treated secondary effluent been considered a promising alternative as the sole makeup water source for recirculating cooling systems (Hsieh et al, 2010;Li et al, 2011a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CaCO 3 hardness of surface water used for cooling depends highly on the geohydrology of the aquifer and can range from soft (<60 mg/L CaCO 3 ) to very hard (>180 mg/L CaCO 3 ). Previously explored strategies to improve water efficiency of wet cooling towers include feed pretreatment [8,9], use of alternative feed sources [10], circulation water conditioning and acidification [11] and blowdown recuperation [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of treated MWW for power plant cooling has been in full-scale operation for several decades. However, MWW is typically used in recirculating cooling systems as a fraction of the total makeup water and/or after significant additional treatment (e.g., Palo Verde Nuclear Generation Station, Maricopa, AZ) . Few studies have focused on the feasibility of using treated MWW as the dominant makeup water with or without additional treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%