2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns to scale in the Eastern United States logging industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated production functions found decreasing return to scale as have similar studies of southern loggers (Duc et al 2009, Lebel and Stuart 1998, Stuart et al 2010). The increased crew investments observed in the Coastal Plain suggest that production function estimates are appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The estimated production functions found decreasing return to scale as have similar studies of southern loggers (Duc et al 2009, Lebel and Stuart 1998, Stuart et al 2010). The increased crew investments observed in the Coastal Plain suggest that production function estimates are appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, Nordic studies have demonstrated that high debt and exclusive reliance on subcontracting seldom pay. In fact, it is difficult to maintain profitability by only increasing production (Stuart et al 2010). Exclusive reliance on engineering solutions may even worsen the business outlook of logging contractors (MacDonald & Clow 1999).…”
Section: International Journal Of Forest Engineering 117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the unit already operates in the CRS region, it usually is not a good idea to change its operating scale, given that this alteration would decrease scale efficiency. Increasing returns to scale in the logging sector have been reported by practicing foresters in a survey of contractors in New Zealand and the United States by Stuart, et al [54]. Our study focused upon the spatial configuration of the harvested sites and not on the contractors; we presented a more general view of the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%