Public space has increasingly become a critical issue in American urbanism. This article examines how the act of Latina/o identity formation in public spaces of American metropolises contain the possibility of new democratic formations. The evidence of Latino/a heritage and culture in spatial interventions, appropriations and practices are a type of place-making activity. This identity-based spatial practice harnesses public participation and carves out spaces for democratic interventions in the city. By focusing on the value of culture as a political capacity, Rios exposes a set of case studies centered around three types of spaces-adaptive, assertive, and negotiative-along a continuum to discuss different ways Latina/ os make group claims in the city and whereupon cultural identity becomes a usable resource for community development practice and local urban policy. The use, access to, and control of public space is, and always has been, political. In recent years, struggles over public space have become a battleground for issues related to terrorism, anti-immigration, and xenophobia, among other confl icts. With respect to the regulation of urban space, manifestations of these antagonisms include gang injunctions, curfew laws, the criminalization of undocumented renters, and government designated "free speech" zones. This is in addition to less obvious forms of exclusion defi ned by privatization, class and cultural markers of who can claim public space. The topic of public space (as a domain, realm, or sphere) has been extensively discussed and includes, among others, the effects of global capitalism and the privatization of space, consumption, and cultural identity (Harvey 1989