1988
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130220030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return of Human Corneal Sensitivity After Penetrating Keratoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, traditional allografts containing donor cells were used, as is the case of human corneal transplantations that the implants are designed to replace. This corresponds to reports where nerve in-growth and touch sensitivity recovers slowly (Ͼ18 mo after laser refractive eye surgery; Ͼ10 yr after LKP) after human corneal wounding or transplantation (33,34). Our result, therefore, represents a dramatic advance over the slow nerve regeneration after current human donor allograft therapy (34) and a demonstration of in vivo nerve regeneration in the cornea promoted by a fabricated material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 39%
“…Here, traditional allografts containing donor cells were used, as is the case of human corneal transplantations that the implants are designed to replace. This corresponds to reports where nerve in-growth and touch sensitivity recovers slowly (Ͼ18 mo after laser refractive eye surgery; Ͼ10 yr after LKP) after human corneal wounding or transplantation (33,34). Our result, therefore, represents a dramatic advance over the slow nerve regeneration after current human donor allograft therapy (34) and a demonstration of in vivo nerve regeneration in the cornea promoted by a fabricated material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 39%
“…Previous IVCM studies show a complete absence of sub-basal nerves in a high proportion of grafts up to 31 years after PK (26)(27)(28)(29), and contact aesthesiometry studies have revealed that grafts remain anaesthetic up to 32 years after PK (26,30,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…As magnitude of the surgical injury depends on pterygium dimensions, a variable number of corneal nerves could be discontinued in any case and, therefore, the time for complete CS recovery could be longer or shorter. Several studies have reported a significant relationship between the depth of the dissection in a surgical procedure and the time for complete CS recovery [25][26][27][28] . In addition, the ideal time to operate the eyes 12 with pterygium seems to be related with small lesions not only because the CS recovery could be faster but also because final astigmatism seems to be lower 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%