2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective multicenter cohort analysis of 621 cases of BellaGel silicone breast implants with study of physicochemical properties and surface topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, CC occurred at an incidence of 8.8%. This is noteworthy because manufacturer-sponsored retrospective studies have shown incidences of 0.0% (0/239), 0.6% (1/78) and 1.6% (10/621) in patients receiving the BellaGel® implants including the BellaGel® SmoothFine [14,19,20]. Interestingly, another manufacturer-sponsored experimental study compared the vulnerability to CC based on surface properties between the BellaGel® implants, including the BellaGel® SmoothFine, and the Motiva Ergonomix TM SilkSurface (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica), thus drawing conclusions that the BellaGel® SmoothFine was the least vulnerable to CC of the sample devices [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, CC occurred at an incidence of 8.8%. This is noteworthy because manufacturer-sponsored retrospective studies have shown incidences of 0.0% (0/239), 0.6% (1/78) and 1.6% (10/621) in patients receiving the BellaGel® implants including the BellaGel® SmoothFine [14,19,20]. Interestingly, another manufacturer-sponsored experimental study compared the vulnerability to CC based on surface properties between the BellaGel® implants, including the BellaGel® SmoothFine, and the Motiva Ergonomix TM SilkSurface (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica), thus drawing conclusions that the BellaGel® SmoothFine was the least vulnerable to CC of the sample devices [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of note, the safety profile of the BellaGel® SmoothFine has been shown to be non-inferior to that of its competitors [18][19][20]. But these reports are from manufacturer-sponsored studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BellaGel ® was first developed in 2005 and then approved by the CE in 2008; it has become commercially available in 30 countries worldwide [26]. Previous studies have described the efficacy and safety of the BellaGel ® [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Of these, a recent study showed that its safety profile was the most excellent among the six different brands of a silicone gel-filled breast implant [28].…”
Section: The Manufacturer's Description Of the Bellagel ® Breast Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the KMFDS, the HansBiomed Co. Ltd. and surgeons shared the same opinions on the safety of the BellaGel ® implants; a finished product of the BellaGel ® would not pose serious risk to human health [36]. The safety of the BellaGel ® implants has been well described in six manufacturersponsored studies whether they are prospective or retrospective in nature [25][26][27][28][29]85]. The HansBiomed Co. Ltd. even sponsored a 10-year prospective study and reported 6-year results.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interest (Coi) As An Obstacle To Resolve Problems Arising From Bellagel ® Breast Implant Scandalmentioning
confidence: 99%