2022
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Assessment of Patient and Catheter Characteristics Associated With Malpositioned Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients

Abstract: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence and characteristics associated with malpositioned temporary, nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) placed via the internal jugular (IJ) and subclavian (SC) veins in pediatric patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(42 reference statements)
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study cohort, over two-thirds of patients received a CVC, half of whom were in the ED, and the other half having one placed later in the OR or ICU. CVC-related mechanical complications occurred in 17.2% of puncture attempts (15.5% of patients), which is in line with the results of previous studies ranging from 1.3% [ 41 ], 3.3% [ 42 ], 12.8% [ 43 ], 14.1% [ 44 ], 20.2% [ 45 ] 25% and 31% [ 46 ] up to 38.4% [ 47 ]. Mechanical complications and malposition had no relevant impact on the treatment course, supporting other studies in the pediatric population and adult trauma population of our study center, in which we found considerable malposition rates of almost 30% [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our study cohort, over two-thirds of patients received a CVC, half of whom were in the ED, and the other half having one placed later in the OR or ICU. CVC-related mechanical complications occurred in 17.2% of puncture attempts (15.5% of patients), which is in line with the results of previous studies ranging from 1.3% [ 41 ], 3.3% [ 42 ], 12.8% [ 43 ], 14.1% [ 44 ], 20.2% [ 45 ] 25% and 31% [ 46 ] up to 38.4% [ 47 ]. Mechanical complications and malposition had no relevant impact on the treatment course, supporting other studies in the pediatric population and adult trauma population of our study center, in which we found considerable malposition rates of almost 30% [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The carina is suggested as an anatomical landmark for CVC tip position that can be easily identified on X‐ray images in many studies 26,27 . The optimal position of the catheter tip has been assumed to be at the level of the carina or to be within 1.5 cm proximal of it 4,18–21 . We assigned this ideal position of the catheter tip to level 2 in our classification of the X‐ray images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first assessed the depth of insertion of the CVC. The optimal catheter tip position was assumed to be at the level of the carina or within 1.5 cm proximal thereof 4,18–21 . For this purpose, we defined three levels of the position of the CVC tip in the chest X‐ray (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The appropriate position of the catheter tip was from the inferior third of the superior vena cava to the opening of the right atrium [3]. Chest X-ray showed that the appropriate position was the carinal process to the two vertebral bodies below it [4], about at T4-T6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%